HITCHCOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JULIAN GARCIA
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of JULIAN GARCIA in 8707 HWY 6, HITCHCOCK, TX 77563 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 340365105.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JULIAN GARCIA
- Site address
- 8707 HWY 6
- City
- HITCHCOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77563
- Mailing
- 5714 WEST GULF BANK ROAD #14, HOUSTON, TX 77088
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,440 · Current $1,440
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms: (a) at the jobsite, employees were working on a scaffold, approximately 14 feet and 10 inches above the ground, with no guardrails.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1440
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: (a) at the jobsite, end frames were used as a means of access on tubular welded frame scaffolding, approximately 14 feet, 10 inches above the ground, as no ladder was provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: (a) at the jobsite, tubular welded frame scaffolding, approximately 14 feet, 10 inches above the ground, was not braced with lateral bracing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $1,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: (a) at the jobsite, employees were working on a tubular welded frame scaffold estimated to be 14 feet and 10 inches in height. The employees were not trained to mitigate hazards of working from a temporary, elevated platform.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1080
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $1,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59) (a) at the jobsite, a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented. Employees use hazardous substances such as Accent Vice Adhesive and Portland Cement, both corrosives, and sand containing crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1080
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (Construction Reference: 1926.59): (a) at the jobsite, safety data sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals such as Accent Vice Adhesive and Portland Cement, both corrosives, were not maintained.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59): a) at the jobsite, employees using hazardous substances such as Accent Vice Adhesive and Portland Cement, both corrosives, and sand containing crystalline silica, were not provided with hazard communication training and information.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Julian Garcia
View Julian Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340365105.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.