FLOWERY BRANCH, GA —
OSHA Inspection: JULIAN GARCIA
Discrimination inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a discrimination health inspection of JULIAN GARCIA in MILBRAE WALK LOT 94, FLOWERY BRANCH, GA 30542 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348829631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JULIAN GARCIA
- Site address
- MILBRAE WALK LOT 94
- City
- FLOWERY BRANCH
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30542
- Mailing
- 66 NORTHWOOD DRIVE #136, ATLANTA, GA 30342
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Discrimination (N)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,702
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a) New construction located at Milbrae Walk, Lot #94, Flowery Branch, GA 30524, Scaffold: On or about 3/24/2026, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees using these tools at 125 PSI while engaged in siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1702
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) New construction located on Lot #94 Millbrae Walk, Flowery Branch, GA 30524, Scaffold: On or about 3/24/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20-feet, 6-inches to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in siding installation activities working from a pump jack scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1. a) New construction located at Milbrae Walk, Lot #94, Flowery Branch, GA 30524, Scaffold: On or about 3/24/2026, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards due to silica exposure from cutting Hardie board siding, in that engineering controls, work practices, or respiratory protection as described in Table-1 were not adhered to while using a circular saw with no vacuum attachment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: a) New construction located at Milbrae Walk, Lot #94, Flowery Branch, GA 30524, Scaffold: On or about 3/24/2026, the employer exposed employees to respirable hazards, in that the employer did not assess all employees who may be exposed to silica health hazards through monitoring to ensure they are not overexposed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Julian Garcia
View Julian Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348829631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.