HUNTINGDON VALLEY, PA —
OSHA Inspection: MAL-BER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MAL-BER MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 2115 BYBERRY ROAD, HUNTINGDON VALLEY, PA 19006 (NAICS 333514). OSHA activity number 340371962.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAL-BER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
- Site address
- 2115 BYBERRY ROAD
- City
- HUNTINGDON VALLEY
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19006
- Mailing
- 2115 BYBERRY RD., HUNTINGDON VALLEY, PA 19006
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333514
- Employees
- 32
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,310 · Current $1,386 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Verson power press were exposed to continuous noise at 84% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 88.7 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 387 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 93 minutes not sampled. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. b.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Emmegi saw, cutting 3/8 to 1/2" aluminum were exposed to continuous noise at 93.2% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 89.5 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 458 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 22 minutes not sampled. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1386
- — Z (S) $2310
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Verson power press were exposed to continuous noise at 84% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 88.7 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 387 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 93 minutes not sampled. The employer did not develop and implement a audiometric testing program. b.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Emmegi saw, cutting 3/8 to 1/2" aluminum were exposed to continuous noise at 93.2% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 89.5 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 458 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 22 minutes not sampled. The employer did not develop and implement a audiometric program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Verson power press were exposed to continuous noise at 84% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 88.7 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 387 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 93 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide training on the effects of noise on hearing, the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use, and care, and the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures. b.) Lower Machine Shop/Press Area - On or about May 14, 2015, Employees, who were operating the Emmegi saw, cutting 3/8 to 1/2" aluminum were exposed to continuous noise at 93.2% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise exposure of 89.5 dBA. This exposure was observed occurring over a 458 minute sampling period on 5/14/15. A zero exposure was assumed for the 22 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide training on the effects of noise on hearing, the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use, and care, and the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,310 · Current $1,386 Reduced
0070X100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Establishment - On or about February 10, 2015, The employer did not maintain or implement a Hazard Communication Program for those employees who were working with hazardous chemicals, including but not limited too; flammables, Acetylene, Oxygen, and other welding gases. Exposing employees to burn and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1386
- — Z (S) $2310
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0070X100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Establishment - On or about February 10, 2015, The employer did not provide training for those employees who were working with hazardous chemicals, including but not limited too; flammables, Acetylene, Oxygen, and other welding gases. Exposing employees to inhalations and burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Mal-Ber Manufacturing Company
View Mal-Ber Manufacturing Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333514)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340371962.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.