OMAHA, NE —
OSHA Inspection: MCGILL RESTORATION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MCGILL RESTORATION, INC. in 9100 JOHN J PERSHING DR, OMAHA, NE 68112 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340407246.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MCGILL RESTORATION, INC.
- Site address
- 9100 JOHN J PERSHING DR
- City
- OMAHA
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68112
- Mailing
- 2821 GREBE STREET, OMAHA, NE 68112
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1000 A01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $3,500 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the ceiling concentration of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter: The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as respiratory distress and occupational asthma in that; employees spraying Series 91 Hydro-Zinc paint manufactured by Tnemec to paint inside the pipe gallery at the project located at 9100 John J Pershing Dr, Omaha, NE 68112 were over exposed to airborne concentrations of Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI), which has a Personal Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter ceiling concentration. The following monitored employees were overexposed to Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) excess of the PEL: Painter#1: exposed to Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) at a 15-minute time-weighted average of 0.69 milligrams per cubic meter, 3.437 times the PEL of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter of air. Sampling was performed on 02/23/2015 while employees were painting inside the pipe gallery located at 9100 John J Pershing Drive, Omaha, NE 68112.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $5390
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as respiratory distress and occupational asthma in that; feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d). Employees spraying Series 91 Hydro-Zinc paint manufactured by Tnemec inside the pipe gallery located at 9100 John J Pershing Dr, Omaha, NE 68112 were over exposed to airborne concentrations of Methylene bisphenyl isocyante (MDI), which has a Personal Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter ceiling concentration. The following monitored employees were overexposed to Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) excess of the PEL: Painter#1: exposed to Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) at a 15-minute time-weighted average of 0.69 milligrams per cubic meter, 3.437 times the PEL of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter. Sampling was performed on 02/23/2015 while employees were painting inside the pipe gallery located at 9100 John J Pershing Drive, Omaha, NE 68112. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations. Step 1 - Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits. (PPE - 30 days) Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with abatement dates required by this citation: 1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control option; 2) Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; 4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Thirty (30) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. (Plan - 30 days) Step 3 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. (Engineering Controls - 90 days) PPE08/01/2015 Engineering Controls10/01/2015 Plan08/01/2015
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,700 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as respiratory distress in that; employees wearing 3M half mask respirators for protection from airborne concentrations of isocyanates while painting inside the enclosed pipe gallery at the project located at 9100 John J Pershing Dr, Omaha, NE 68112 were not provided with a medical evaluation to determine their ability to use their respirators prior to use. McGill Restoration, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314055351, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 5th, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 450 Regency Parkway, Omaha, NE 68114.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4000
- — Z (R) $7700
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,700 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and annually thereafter: The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as respiratory distress and occupational asthma in that; employees wearing 3M half mask respirators for protection from airborne concentrations of isocyanates while painting inside the enclosed pipe gallery at the project located at 9100 John J Pershing Dr, Omaha, NE 68112 were not fit tested prior to initial use of their respirators and/or annually thereafter. McGill Restoration, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314055351, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 5th, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 450 Regency Parkway, Omaha, NE 68114.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4000
- — Z (R) $7700
More inspections at Mcgill Restoration, INC.
View Mcgill Restoration, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340407246.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.