Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRUCANO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TRUCANO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in AURORA HARBOR RE-BUILD BARGE CP 39, JUNEAU, AK 99801 (NAICS 237990). OSHA activity number 340430032.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Trucano Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Trucano Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
AURORA HARBOR RE-BUILD BARGE CP 39
City
JUNEAU
State
AK
ZIP
99801
Mailing
3560 NORTH DOUGLAS HIGHWAY, JUNEAU, AK 99801
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237990
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2015
Abate by
Apr 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection:  Aurora Harbor, Barge CP 39:  On or about February 25, 2015 and at times prior thereto, while personnel were elevated on a personnel platform, fall protection was not provided.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of up to 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1412 F05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2015
Abate by
Apr 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(5): After the qualified person determined that a deficiency on the crane was a safety hazard, the employer did not remove the equipment from service until it had been corrected:  Barge CP 39:  On or about February 25, 2015 and at times prior thereto, where the annual crane inspection of the Manitowoc 4000W, Serial Number 40304, Crawler Mounted Lattice Boom Crane stated the flat bar on the lower cords of the tip insert have broken welds and correction is required prior to re-certification, the employer continued to use the equipment.  This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards in the event of equipment failure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1431 G04

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(g)(4): Eyes in wire rope slings were not fabricated with thimbles:  Aurora Harbor, Barge CP 39:  On or about February 25, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the four (4) wire rope slings used to hoist employees on a personnel platform were not fabricated with thimbles.  This condition damaged the wire rope and exposed employees to a fall hazard of up to 20 feet in the event of sling failure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1431 P02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(p)(2): For lattice boom cranes: The cable was not clearly marked (so that it could easily be seen by the operator) at a point that will give the operator sufficient time to stop the hoist to prevent two-blocking, or  a spotter was not used who was in direct communication with the operator to inform the operator when this point is reached.   Aurora Harbor, Barge CP 39, Manitowoc Model 4000W:  On or about February 25, 2015 and at times prior thereto, while hoisting personnel, the cable was not clearly marked to prevent two-blocking.  This condition exposed employees to struck-by and fall hazards in the event of two-blocking.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2200

View Trucano Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340430032.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.