PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. in 7400 95TH STREET, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 340453398.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
- Site address
- 7400 95TH STREET
- City
- PLEASANT PRAIRIE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53158
- Mailing
- 7400 95TH STREET, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493120
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer did not include all equipment that was part of the process on piping and instrument diagrams: (a) The piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) for the SW-01 Compressor, in the Engine Room, did not include and/or identify a 3-way valve which regulated the flow of high pressure liquid (HPL) anhydrous ammonia. (b) The piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) for the SW-01 Compressor, in the Engine Room, did not include and/or identify a Plate & Shell Heat Exchanger and associated valves.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: (a) Cooler A Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543421): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (b) Cooler A Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543424): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (c) Cooler D Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543422): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (d) Cooler D Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543423): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (e) Penthouse Krack FA-02 Evaporator (Serial No. 465327-02A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (f) Penthouse Krack FA-03 Evaporator (Serial No.465327-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (g) Penthouse Krack FB-03 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-2B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (h) Penthouse Krack FB-04 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-1B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (i) Penthouse Krack FB-05 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (j) Penthouse Krack FB-06 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-2A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (k) Penthouse Krack CA-01 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-08): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (l) Penthouse Krack CA-02 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-7): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (m) Penthouse Krack CA-03 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-6B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (n) Penthouse Krack CA-04 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-5B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (o) Penthouse Krack CA-05 Evaporator (Serial No. 481663-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (p) Penthouse Krack CA-06 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-6A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (q) Penthouse Krack CA-07 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-03-A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (r) Penthouse Krack CA-08 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-4): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (s) Penthouse Krack CA-09 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-01): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). (t) Penthouse Krack CA-10 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-2): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.119 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The Process Hazard Analysis did not address the hazards of the process: (a) Section 13 of the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) Report, dated February 25-26, 2014, did not address the hazards of entry of impurities into the anhydrous ammonia system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.119 F01 III D
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(D): The employer's written operating procedures covering safety and health considerations did not address quality control for raw materials and control of hazardous chemical inventory levels: (a) The anhydrous ammonia system charge procedure (SOP-14) did not address the quality control of the incoming ammonia necessary to verify that ammonia received was refrigerant grade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.119 F01 III B
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B): The employer failed to ensure that the Process Safety Management Standard Operating Procedures included safety and health consideration of precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment: (a) SOP-13 "Oil Recovery Operations" did not specify required personal protective equipment to be used by workers when performing oil recovery operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Regarding the oil draining operation performed in the Engine Room, a hazard assessment had not been performed which addressed the hazards of exposure to anhydrous ammonia.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q10
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
0170
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(10): Chemical protective clothing and equipment to be used by organized and designated HAZMAT team members, or to be used by hazardous materials specialists, did not meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3) through (g)(5): (a) The Emergency Response Plan (ERP) did not adequately address the limitations of the level "A" containment suits, as required by 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(5). (b) The employer did not assure that the level "A" containment suits were capable of preventing gas leakage as required by 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(4).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: (a) The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures for various equipment, including, but not limited to, forklift trucks, lift truck charger, sweepers, and scrubbers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
More inspections at Meijer Distribution, INC.
View Meijer Distribution, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493120)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340453398.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.