Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. in 7400 95TH STREET, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 340453398.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Meijer Distribution, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meijer Distribution, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7400 95TH STREET
City
PLEASANT PRAIRIE
State
WI
ZIP
53158
Mailing
7400 95TH STREET, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493120
Employees
250
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 250 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer did not include all equipment that was part of the process on piping and instrument diagrams:     (a) The piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) for the SW-01 Compressor, in the Engine Room, did not include and/or identify a 3-way valve which regulated the flow of high pressure liquid (HPL) anhydrous ammonia.      (b) The piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) for the SW-01 Compressor, in the Engine Room, did not include and/or identify a Plate & Shell Heat Exchanger and associated valves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 D03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 20 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:  (a) Cooler A Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543421): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (b) Cooler A Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543424): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (c) Cooler D Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543422): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (d) Cooler D Penthouse Evapco Evaporator (Serial No. 13-543423): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (e) Penthouse Krack FA-02 Evaporator (Serial No. 465327-02A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (f) Penthouse Krack FA-03 Evaporator (Serial No.465327-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (g) Penthouse Krack FB-03 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-2B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (h) Penthouse Krack FB-04 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-1B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (i) Penthouse Krack FB-05 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (j) Penthouse Krack FB-06 Evaporator (Serial No. 407934-2A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (k) Penthouse Krack CA-01 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-08): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (l) Penthouse Krack CA-02 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-7): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (m) Penthouse Krack CA-03 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-6B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (n) Penthouse Krack CA-04 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-5B): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (o) Penthouse Krack CA-05 Evaporator (Serial No. 481663-01A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (p) Penthouse Krack CA-06 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-6A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (q) Penthouse Krack CA-07 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-03-A): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (r) Penthouse Krack CA-08 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-4): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (s) Penthouse Krack CA-09 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-01): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).  (t) Penthouse Krack CA-10 Evaporator (Serial No. 407935-2): The U-1 Form, Manufacturers Certificate of Compliance Covering Pressure Vessels was not maintained to document that the evaporator complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 250 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The Process Hazard Analysis did not address the hazards of the process:    (a) Section 13 of the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) Report, dated February 25-26, 2014,  did not address the hazards of entry of impurities into the anhydrous ammonia system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 F01 III D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 250 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(D): The employer's written operating procedures  covering safety and health considerations did not address quality control for raw materials and control of hazardous chemical inventory levels:     (a) The anhydrous ammonia system charge procedure (SOP-14) did not address the quality control of the incoming ammonia necessary to verify that ammonia received was refrigerant grade.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 F01 III B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B): The employer failed to ensure that the Process Safety Management Standard Operating Procedures included safety and health consideration of precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment:    (a) SOP-13 "Oil Recovery Operations" did not specify required personal protective equipment to be used by workers when performing oil recovery operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Regarding the oil draining operation performed in the Engine Room, a hazard assessment had not been performed which addressed the hazards of exposure to anhydrous ammonia.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q10

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(10): Chemical protective clothing and equipment to be used by organized and designated HAZMAT team members, or to be used by hazardous materials specialists, did not meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3) through (g)(5):     (a) The Emergency Response Plan (ERP) did not adequately address the limitations of  the level "A" containment suits, as required by 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(5).     (b) The employer did not assure that the level "A" containment suits were capable of preventing gas leakage as required by  29 CFR 1910.120(g)(4).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Oct 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    (a) The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures for various equipment, including, but not limited to, forklift trucks, lift truck charger, sweepers, and scrubbers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

View Meijer Distribution, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340453398.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.