Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SP CONSTRUCTION LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SP CONSTRUCTION LLC in 3 STONEWALL LANE, WESTPORT, CT 06880 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340459767.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SP Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SP Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SP CONSTRUCTION LLC
Site address
3 STONEWALL LANE
City
WESTPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06880
Mailing
11 CLARK STREET APART 2, DANBURY, CT 06810
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person.    Jobsite:  The frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment were not made by a competent person through not only establishing, initiating and but also maintaining a safety program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the scaffolds were erected and altered under the direct supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Scaffold(s) and scaffold(s) component(s) were not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least four times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it:    Jobsite:  The "job-made" lean-to scaffold and its components, from which an employee was working to apply finish trim to portico were not capable of supporting at least four (4) times the maximum intended load.      On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold dismantled and collapsed while the employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries from the incident.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  Jobsite: The "job-made" lean-to scaffold, from which an employee was working to apply finish trim to the portico was not designed by a qualified person.  On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold was dismantled and collapsed while the employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries form the incident.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 C01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(iii): Ties, guys, braces, or outriggers were not installed to prevent the tipping of supported scaffolds in all circumstances where an eccentric load, such as a cantilevered work platform, was applied or was transmitted to the scaffold.  Jobsite:  The horizontal lumber that was used to support the cantilevered working surface/platform of the "job-made" lean-to scaffold was not adequately braced, tied or otherwise appropriately secured to prevent from tipping, collapsing or dismantling.   On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold was dismantled and collapsed while an employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries from the incident.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:      Jobsite:  The legs of the "job-made" lean-to scaffold from that an employee was working to apply finish trim on the portico were not bearing on base plates and mudsills or otherwise placed on firm foundation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(2): The use of shore or lean-to scaffolds was not prohibited:  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure through providing specific instructions and visual observations or other means that the employee, who was required to apply finish trim to the portico was not utilizing lean-to type scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who performed work from the scaffold were trained by a qualified person in the hazards related to the scaffold and the procedures to control or minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employee, who was involved in not only erecting, but also assembling a "job-made" lean-to scaffold  was trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the types of work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View SP Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340459767.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.