WESTPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: SP CONSTRUCTION LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SP CONSTRUCTION LLC in 3 STONEWALL LANE, WESTPORT, CT 06880 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340459767.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SP CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 3 STONEWALL LANE
- City
- WESTPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06880
- Mailing
- 11 CLARK STREET APART 2, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person. Jobsite: The frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment were not made by a competent person through not only establishing, initiating and but also maintaining a safety program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the scaffolds were erected and altered under the direct supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 A01
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Scaffold(s) and scaffold(s) component(s) were not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least four times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it: Jobsite: The "job-made" lean-to scaffold and its components, from which an employee was working to apply finish trim to portico were not capable of supporting at least four (4) times the maximum intended load. On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold dismantled and collapsed while the employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries from the incident.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: Jobsite: The "job-made" lean-to scaffold, from which an employee was working to apply finish trim to the portico was not designed by a qualified person. On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold was dismantled and collapsed while the employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries form the incident.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 C01 III
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(iii): Ties, guys, braces, or outriggers were not installed to prevent the tipping of supported scaffolds in all circumstances where an eccentric load, such as a cantilevered work platform, was applied or was transmitted to the scaffold. Jobsite: The horizontal lumber that was used to support the cantilevered working surface/platform of the "job-made" lean-to scaffold was not adequately braced, tied or otherwise appropriately secured to prevent from tipping, collapsing or dismantling. On or about March 12, 2015, the above scaffold was dismantled and collapsed while an employee was working, and the employee sustained severe injuries from the incident.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: Jobsite: The legs of the "job-made" lean-to scaffold from that an employee was working to apply finish trim on the portico were not bearing on base plates and mudsills or otherwise placed on firm foundation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F02
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(2): The use of shore or lean-to scaffolds was not prohibited: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure through providing specific instructions and visual observations or other means that the employee, who was required to apply finish trim to the portico was not utilizing lean-to type scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who performed work from the scaffold were trained by a qualified person in the hazards related to the scaffold and the procedures to control or minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.454 B
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employee, who was involved in not only erecting, but also assembling a "job-made" lean-to scaffold was trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the types of work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at SP Construction LLC
View SP Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340459767.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.