Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUGUSTA COATING & MANUFACTURING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUGUSTA COATING & MANUFACTURING, LLC in 1048 SUPERIOR HWY, THOMSON, GA 30824 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 340460039.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Augusta Coating & Manufacturing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Augusta Coating & Manufacturing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1048 SUPERIOR HWY
City
THOMSON
State
GA
ZIP
30824
Mailing
1048 SUPERIOR HWY, THOMSON, GA 30824
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
113
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  a) Plant, e-coat line - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees came in contact with chemicals including (but not limited to) Powercron Black Feed (PPG Product Code CF691B-524) and the employer did not assess the e-coat line to determine the associated hazards, and the need for personal protective equipment.    b) Plant, powder coat line - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees came in contact with chemicals including (but not limited to) Envirocron Powder (PPG Product Code PCT49118), and the employer did not assess the powder-coat line to determine the associated hazards, and the need for personal protective equipment.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  a) Plant, e-coat line - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees came in contact with chemicals including (but not limited to) Powercron Black Feed (PPG Product Code CF691B-524) and the employer did not select and did not require the use of appropriate hand protection.     b) Plant, powder coat line - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees came in contact with chemicals including (but not limited to) Envirocron Powder (PPG Product Code PCT49118), and the employer did  and the employer did not select and did not require the use of appropriate hand protection.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) Facility - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees performed repairs/maintenance of machinery including (but not limited to) the equipment described in the document ACM Equipment Log (03/11/2015 11:17 AM) which is subjected to lockout/tagout. The employer did not develop, implement, and utilize individual written lockout/tagout procedures to protect workers from electrical and amputation hazards.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:  a) Plant, Shop Area - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Baldor bench grinder/buffer S.N. P599, 1800 rpm. The machine did not have a tongue guard installed on the left side (grinding wheel), and the gap between the wheel and the guard could not be adjusted to a maximum gap of 1/4 in.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  Plant, e-coat line - On or about 03/11/15 and at times prior thereto employees cleaned parts with compressed air to remove coating residues and came in contact with Powercron Black Feed (PPG Product Code CF691B-524). The employer did not maintain a copy of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) at the workplace to inform workers of the toxic/hazardous properties of the material.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

View Augusta Coating & Manufacturing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340460039.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.