Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: S1J CONTRACTOR CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of S1J CONTRACTOR CORP. in 147 BEACH RD., WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NY 11978 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340463637.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S1J Contractor Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S1J Contractor Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
147 BEACH RD.
City
WESTHAMPTON BEACH
State
NY
ZIP
11978
Mailing
338 GROVE AVE, PATCHOGUE, NY 11772
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket, were sitting or climbing on the edge of the basket, or were using planks, ladders, or other devices for a work position:    a) Worksite: Employees were doing framing and sheathing work from a Lull aerial lift model 944E-42. One employee climbed over the edge of the basket of the lift to access the roof of the commercial building approximately 24 ft. above the ground; on or about 3/13/15.    Note:  In addition to abatement certification the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:   a) Worksite: Employees were doing framing and sheathing work from a Lull aerial lift model 944E-42, approximately 18 ft. 6 in. above the ground. The employees were not wearing a body belt and/or a lanyard attached to the basket; on or about 3/13/2015.  Note:  In addition to abatement certification the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:    a) Worksite: Employees were using the Lull aerial lift model 944E-42 with a working platform to do framing and sheathing work. Employees who operated the lift were not trained to operate such equipment; on or about 3/13/15.    Note:  The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1320

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178:  a) Worksite: Employees were using the Lull aerial lift model 944E-42 to do framing and sheathing work. An employee who operated the lift was not trained and evaluated to operate such equipment; on or about 3/13/15.  Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:    a) Worksite: An employee was anchoring the frame from the roof of the new commercial building approximately 24 ft. above the ground without fall protection; on or about 3/13/15.    Note:  In addition to abatement certification the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.100 A

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) Worksite: Employees working directly under ongoing framing and roofing activities from the Lull aerial lift model 944E-42 were not using head protection; on or about 3/13/15.    Note:   Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.    S1J Contractor Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 997034, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on 12/18/14, with respect to a worksite located at 325 Montauk Highway in East Quogue, NY 11942.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $2640

View S1J Contractor Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340463637.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.