Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAVY EXCHANGE WEST COAST

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NAVY EXCHANGE WEST COAST in 4250 EUCALYPTUS AVE, CHINO, CA 91710 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340487040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Navy Exchange West Coast — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Navy Exchange West Coast is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4250 EUCALYPTUS AVE
City
CHINO
State
CA
ZIP
91710
Mailing
4250 EUCALYPTUS AVE, CHINO, CA 91710
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
190
Ownership type
D

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  a. MHE #30 - On or about 4/16/15, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the fall protection tie-off point was able to self-lock.    b. RPK Area - On or about mid-March 2015, the employer did not ensure that personal protective equipment was provided to protect employees from falling metal pieces during construction.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:  Maintenance shop - On or about 3/23/15,  a welding jacket exhibited holes and was not in a reliable condition.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 105 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:   At the establishment - On or about 3/20/15, and at times prior thereto, welding and/or heating and bending was performed on forklift load rests and masts without the manufacturer's prior written approval.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 G11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(g)(11): Precautions were not taken to prevent open flames, sparks, or electric arcs in battery charging area(s):  Battery charging area - On or about 3/20/15, precautions were not taken to prevent sparks and electric arcs in areas adjacent to the battery charging area, such as but not limited to, electrical panels not adequately closed, grinding and welding in the maintenance shop, and plug-in electrical equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 105 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  At the establishment - On or about 3/23/15, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that each operator of mechanical handling equipment (MHE) had successfully completed evaluation of the specific MHE they are operating.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 105 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:  a. MHE # 32 - On or about 3/23/15, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that lights were operational prior to use.    b. MHE # 73 - On or about 3/23/15, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the wheels were in safe operating condition prior to use.  c. MHE# 30  On or about 3/14/15, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that tires, steering, and service brake were not in good operating condition prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:   Maintenance shop - On or about 3/23/15, the opening between the grinding wheel and the work rest was greater than one eighth inch.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:   Maintenance shop - On or about 3/23/15, the distance between the left wheel and the tongue guard was greater than one fourth inch.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  a. Maintenance shop - On or about 3/23/15, the employer did not maintain a safety data sheet for CRC Battery cleaner.  b. Maintenance shop - On or about 3/23/15, the employer did not maintain a safety data sheet for High Performance Touch-up paint.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:   At the facility - On or about 4/16/15, a new conveyor's catwalk was not designed by a qualified person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Navy Exchange West Coast's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340487040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.