Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MONTECILLO MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MONTECILLO MASONRY, INC. in 18701 LIME STONE COMMERCIAL DRIVE, PFLUGERVILLE, TX 78660 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340492453.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Montecillo Masonry, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Montecillo Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18701 LIME STONE COMMERCIAL DRIVE
City
PFLUGERVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78660
Mailing
1301 WEST BEN WHITE BLVD, STE 200G, AUSTIN, TX 78704
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    On or about March 26, 2015, and at times prior thereto, a platform (pallet/box) was supported by rough terrain forklift and was used to elevate personnel for masonry activities. The employer who designed the platform (pallet/box) was not qualified and/or did not adhere to published guidelines for safe use and design of elevating platforms and rough terrain forklifts, such as ASME/ANSI B56.6, 2005 and specifically, section 8.24, items such as:    a)  A platform floor having slip resistant surface.  b)  A 4 inch minimum height toe plate which may be omitted at the access opening.  c) Protection for personnel in their normal working position on the platform from moving parts of the rough terrain forklift truck that present a hazard.  d) A means to securely attach the platform to the lifting mechanism, and to prevent the platform from inadvertent pivoting.  e) Restraining means such as a guardrails or a means for securing personnel such as a fall protection harness.    Employees were exposed to pivoting, slippage or tipping of the platform and forklift creating a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about March 26, 2015 an at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a competent person perform daily inspections of the scaffold platform (pallet/box), exposing employees to the hazards of falls and/or scaffold collapse/failure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval:  On or about March 26, 2015 and at times prior thereto, a rough terrain forklift was used to elevate personnel for construction work. The employer did not consult the manufacturer on the design of the platform and necessary changes to the forklift operational decals. Employees were exposed to the hazards of falls up to approximately 14 feet and/or scaffold collapse/failure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:    On or about March, 26, 2015, and at times prior thereto, a platform (pallet/box) installed on the Gradall rough terrain forklift was used to elevate personnel to perform work on the building under construction. The forklift was not designed for such use per the manufacturer's operations manual, exposing employees to the hazard of falling approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:   On or about March 26, 2015, an employee working from an elevated platform (pallet/box) that was not securely attached to the lift to prevent the platform from sliding off. The platform was used with the Gradall rough terrain forklift to access elevated positions on the building under construction, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    On or about March 26, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the employee working from a platform (pallet/box) elevated by the Gradall rough terrain forklift was protected from falling up to approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at 1910.178(l) of this chapter.    Each powered industrial truck operator did not complete training as required.    29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii) Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer shall ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5).    On or about March 26, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the operator of the Gradall rough terrain forklift, model 534C-9 was trained and certified in the safe operations of forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface shall be used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  On or about March 26, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees used a scaffold ladder to gain access to the four tier tubular welded frame scaffolding, exposing employees to the hazard of falling up to 28 feet.   The Montecillo Masonry Company was previously cited twice for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1), which were contained in OSHA inspection numbers 314303405 & 941441, citation numbers 01&01, items 004&002 and were affirmed as a final order on February 14, 2011 & November 15, 2013 with respect to the workplaces located at 460 U.S. Hwy 79, Hutto, TX 78634 & Stone Hill Center, Tract 3B & 4B, Pflugerville, TX 78660.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $4000
  • — Z (R) $4000

View Montecillo Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340492453.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.