HAZLETON, PA —
OSHA Inspection: PECO PALLET, INCORPORATED
Follow-up inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of PECO PALLET, INCORPORATED in P.O. BOX 207 1104 NORTH PARK DRIVE, HAZLETON, PA 18202 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 340492859.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PECO PALLET, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- P.O. BOX 207 1104 NORTH PARK DRIVE
- City
- HAZLETON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18202
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 207 1104 NORTH PARK DRIVE, HAZLETON, PA 18202
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321920
- Employees
- 63
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G05 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared: a) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 3 Table 19, was exposed to continuous noise at 157.9 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 93.3 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 443 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 37 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide all employees with a baseline audiogram within 6 months of their first noise exposure at or above the action level of 85 dBA (8-hour time-weighted average), discovered on or about 03/31/2015. b) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 1 Table 4, was exposed to continuous noise at 105.1 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90.4 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 438 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 42 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide all employees with a baseline audiogram within 6 months of their first noise exposure at or above the action level of 85 dBA (8-hour time-weighted average), discovered on or about 03/31/2015. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3600
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels : a) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 2 Table 13, was exposed to continuous noise at 151.2 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 93.0 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 461 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 19 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide all employees with an annual audiogram within 1 year their baseline audiogram, discovered on or about 03/31/2015. b) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 1 Table 5, was exposed to continuous noise at 130.6 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 91.9 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 460 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 20 minutes not sampled. The employer did not provide all employees with an annual audiogram within 1 year their baseline audiogram, discovered on or about 03/31/2015. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $49,500 · Current $7,000 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized: a) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 3 Table 19, was exposed to continuous noise at 157.9 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 93.3 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 443 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 37 minutes not sampled. The employer did not utilize feasible administrative or engineering controls to reduce sound levels for those employees exposed over the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA, discovered on or about 03/31/2015. b) PECO Pallet: An employee, Pallet Repairer at Line 2 Table 13, was exposed to continuous noise at 151.2 % of the exposure level of 85 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 93.0 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 461 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 19 minutes not sampled. The employer did not utilize feasible administrative or engineering controls to reduce sound levels for those employees exposed over the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA, discovered on or about 03/31/2015. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PECO Pallet, Incorporated was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 959440, citation number 01, item number 01a, and was affirmed as a final order on 08/26/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 1104 North Park Drive, Hazleton, PA 18202. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Install noise barriers (sound curtains) between the pallet repair workstations. 2. Increase the distance between pallet repair lines. 3. Apply sound dampening material to pallet repair workstation metal tabletops. 4. Install mufflers on the compressed air exhaust of pneumatic nail guns. 5. Apply sound dampening material on the piston assembly of pneumatic nail guns to reduce impact noise created when the piston strikes the front bumper. 6. Rotation or movement of employees into areas of low noise levels to reduce their daily exposure and train/instruct employees not to remain near sources of hazardous noise when their presence is not necessary. ABATEMENT NOTE: Step 1: A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to noise as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation: 1) Evaluation of engineering control options; 2) Selection of optimum control method and completion of design; 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; 4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. 45-day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 2: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Date by which violates must be abated: Step 1 XX/XX/XXXX Date by which violates must be abated: Step 2 XX/XX/XXXX
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (W) $49500
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours: a) PECO Pallet: On January 24, 2015, an employee suffered a work-related injury that resulted in the employee being hospitalized and the employer failed to report the injury to OSHA within 24 hours, discovered on or about 03/26/2015. ABATED DURING INSPECTION NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (O) $1000
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) PECO Pallet: Employees worked with hazardous chemicals, including, but not limited to, Kelly-Moore Red Latex Pallet Paint, and the employer did not provide these employees with the required OSHA Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) training prior to the effective date of December 1, 2013, discovered on or about 03/31/2015. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Peco Pallet, Incorporated
View Peco Pallet, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321920)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340492859.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.