Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SYNCOT PLASTICS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SYNCOT PLASTICS, INC. in 707 S. ERWIN STREET, CARTERSVILLE, GA 30120 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340497528.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Syncot Plastics, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Syncot Plastics, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
707 S. ERWIN STREET
City
CARTERSVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30120
Mailing
707 S. ERWIN STREET, CARTERSVILLE, GA 30120
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
198
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a)  The operator on line 4 was exposed to noise levels at 119.6% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 91.2 dBA during 437 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  b)  The operator on line 1 was exposed to noise levels at 117.2% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 91.1 dBA during 432 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  c)  The extrusion operator was exposed to noise levels at 288.8% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 97.6 dBA during 472 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  d)  The grinder operator was exposed to noise levels at 119.7% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 91.3 dBA during 426 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  e)  The operator on line 2 was exposed to noise levels at 98.61% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 89.9 dBA during 391 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  f)  The operator on line 4 was exposed to noise levels at 110.8% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 90.7 dBA during 457 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.  g)  The operator on line 3 was exposed to noise levels at 122.4% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 91.4 dBA during 408 minute sampling period on March 31, 2015.  The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 85 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Oct 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  Throughout the facility - The employer did not establish or implement a site-specific written hazard communication program for the employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to: potassium hydroxide, acetone, methanol, formic acid, propane, oxygen and argon compressed gases used for welding, exposing the employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 85 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Oct 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)  Throughout the facility -  The employer did not provide training, to include the new globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS) that became effective December 1, 2013, to employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to: potassium hydroxide, acetone, methanol, formic acid, propane, oxygen and argon compressed gases used for welding, exposing the employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Syncot Plastics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340497528.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.