Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: O.K. INDUSTRIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of O.K. INDUSTRIES, INC. in 18593 HIGHWAY 128 EAST, HEAVENER, OK 74937 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 340497999.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch O.K. Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for O.K. Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18593 HIGHWAY 128 EAST
City
HEAVENER
State
OK
ZIP
74937
Mailing
18593 HIGHWAY 128 EAST, HEAVENER, OK 74937
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311119
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards.      a. On or about March 23, 2015, 4th floor of feed mill, feed processing bins vented grain product dust inside the building during feed processing.          b. On or about March 23, 2015, 3rd floor of feed mill, night shift employees were not informed of oxygen-acetylene torch cutting in mash feed bin 84 during feed processing.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an appropriate venting and control of hot work is in place.    Among other methods one feasible and acceptable method of abatement is to follow NFPA 51B and 61 Standards for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, 2013 Edition.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3300
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.272 M04

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,500 Reduced
Grouped as one Serious violation with Citation 1, Item 3.  Also, the citation will now read as follows:      29 CFR 1910.272(m)(4): The employer did not implement  written procedures in the grain handling facility to prevent the inadvertent application of energy or motion to equipment being repaired, serviced, or adjusted:      a. On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 4th floor, the employer did not implement written procedures to block off piping between the distributor and mash feed bins 84 and 85.        b. On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3rd floor, the employer did not implement written procedures for the use of tags and locks for pneumatic slide gates of mash feed bins 84 and 85.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an appropriate  energy control procedures are available and in use. .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5500
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.272 E01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
Grouped as one Serious violation with Citation 1, Item 2.  Also, the Citation will now read as follows:    29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1)(ii): Current employees and new employees prior to starting work in the grain handling facility were not trained in the specific procedures and safety practices applicable to their job tasks including but not limited to cleaning procedures for grinding equipment, clearing procedures for choked legs, housekeeping procedures, hot work procedures, preventive maintenance procedures and lock out tag out procedures:     On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill, the employer, though it provided training to certain employees, it did not ensure annual training on lockout tagout procedures was provided to all authorized or affected employees.         Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that appropriate energy control training has been done.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.272 I01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(i)(1): The employer did not inform contractors of the applicable safety rules of the grain handling facility:    On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3th floor, a contractor was not informed of applicable safety rules including but not limited to distributor lockout procedures for mash feed bins 84 and 85, and bin entry procedures or permit required confined space entry procedures.  Contractor employees performed oxygen acetylene torch cutting in mash feed bins 85 and 84 which exposed contractor and feed mill employees to fire and explosion hazards.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that appropriate  energy control information and safety rules  are relayed between employers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.272 J01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1): The employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program that established the frequency and the method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other exposed surfaces:    On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill, the employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program to prevent accumulations of grain product dust.  Grain product dust accumulations were present on elevated surfaces including but not limited the top surfaces of enclosed conveyors and wall ledges which exposes employees to fire and explosion hazards.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an appropriate  written housekeeping program is in place
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.252 A02 III A 1

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(iii)(A)(1): The employer did not provide fire watchers whenever welding or cutting was performed, where appreciable combustible material in building construction or contents was closer than 35 feet (10.7 m) to the point of operation:    On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3rd floor, the employer did not ensure a contractor employer provided a fire watch at all times when a contractor employee used an oxygen and acetylene torch in mash feed bin 84 where mash feed (combustible dust) was present.  A contractor employee and a feed mill employee received burns from a fire at mash feed bin 84.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that  appropriate  precautions including fire watch are taken during welding and cutting operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.252 A02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(iv): Cutting or welding was permitted in areas before the areas were inspected by the individual responsible for authorizing cutting and welding operations:   On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3rd floor, the employer's individual responsible for authorizing a contractor to torch cut, did not inspect the area and ensure the contractor followed the precautions marked on the hot work permit for torch cutting mash feed bins 84 and 85 which exposes contactor employees and feed mill employees to fire and explosion hazards.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that areas are inspected before cutting and welding take place.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:       On or about March 23, 2015, 3rd floor of feed mill, the employer did not provide a night shift temporary cleanup worker with protective clothing.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that appropriate personal protective clothing is provided and used.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.252 A02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(v): Where combustible materials such as paper clippings, wood shavings, or textile fibers were on the floor, the employer did not ensure that the floor was swept clean for a radius of 35 feet (10.7 m) from the cutting or welding operation:     On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3rd floor, the employer did not ensure mash feed on the floor was cleaned a radius of 35 feet from oxygen-acetylene torch cutting done by two contractor employees in mash feed bin 84.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that combustible materials are removed from the cutting and welding areas.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5200
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.252 A02 XIV C 3

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(xiv)(C)(3): The employer did not ensure that the supervisor saw that cutting and welding was so scheduled that plant operations that might expose combustibles to ignition were not started during cutting or welding:    On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 3rd floor, oxygen-acetylene torch cutting in bin 84 was done during feed processing operations which caused mash feed (combustible dust) to fall overhead of a contractor in bin 84 who was operating an oxygen acetylene torch that ignited feed dust and exposed contractor employees and feed mill employees to a fire at bin 84.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that cutting and welding is only scheduled when plant operations limit the exposure of combustible materials.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.304 G05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:    On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill, 4th floor, an extension cord lacked a grounding prong and was used to power portable lights in bins 84 and 85.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all electrical circuits and cords have appropriate grounding.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3300
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.334 A02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service and an employee was using it before repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe were made:     On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill, 4th floor, an extension cord used to power drop lights in mash feed bins 84 and 85 had a cut in the outer jacket.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all damaged electrical equipment is removed from service.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:     a. On or about March 26, 2015, feed mill, a safety data sheet was not obtained for hazardous chemicals including but not limited to soybean meal (combustible dust).             b. On or about March 26, 2015, feed mill, a safety data sheet was not obtained for hazardous chemicals including but not limited to ground corn (combustible dust).        Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all safety data sheets are obtained and available.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3300
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:     On or about March 26, 2015, feed mill, a safety data sheet for hazardous chemicals including but not limited to compressed oxygen (oxidizer) for torch cutting, was not readily available to employees.  The safety data sheet for compressed oxygen was only available through the employers intranet website, and all employees were not trained on how to access safety data sheets through the employers intranet website.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all safety data sheets are obtained and available.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.272 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2015
Abate by
Oct 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $38,500 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii): Prior to entry, all mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presented a danger to employees inside grain storage structures in the grain handling facility were not disconnected, locked out and tagged, blocked-off, or other-wise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods:        a. On or about March 23, 2015, feed mill 4th floor, the employer did not de-energize the distributor for bins 84, 85; and did not disconnect, lockout and tag, or block-off the pipes between the distributor and mash feed bins 84 and 85 when contractors worked in the bins and used oxygen-acetylene torches.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that equipment and conditions that present a danger prior to entry are  disconnected, locked out and tagged, blocked-off, or other-wise prevented from operating.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (R) $38500
  • — Z (R) $38500

View O.K. Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340497999.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.