Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BLAZER BUILDING, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BLAZER BUILDING, INC. in 2120 STEPHENS PLACE, NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78132 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340510882.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Blazer Building, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Blazer Building, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2120 STEPHENS PLACE
City
NEW BRAUNFELS
State
TX
ZIP
78132
Mailing
9219 KATY FREEWAY SUITE 264, HOUSTON, TX 77024
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    At the Creekside Park Apartments, 2120 Stephens Place, New Braunfels, TX 78130, on 31 March 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections for safety hazards such as but not limited to; fall hazards, operator certification and sanitary health concerns.  Employees were exposed to these and other hazards at the property under construction.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.51 F03 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(3)(iii): Hand soap or similar cleansing agent was not provided.    At the Creekside Park Apartments, 2120 Stephens Place, New Braunfels, TX 78130, on 31 March 2015 and at times prior thereto, approximately 70 workers used portable toilet facilities throughout the jobsite and ate lunch onsite without a means of hand cleansing provided
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval.    At the Creekside Park Apartments, 2120 Stephens Place, New Braunfels, TX 78130, on 31 March 2015 and at times prior thereto, the forklift operator was supporting a job-made trash box up to the fourth floor of the building under construction with materials in the box.  After the box was partially unloaded a worker entered the box from the 4th floor balcony over the permanent balcony rail.  The box became unstable and fell to the ground. The box was not approved to be used as a personnel platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(d): Powered industrial truck operator training.  Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at 1910.178(l) of this chapter.    29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii) Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5).    On or about March 31, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not did not require the operator to complete a formal training program on the safe operation of the lift.  The employer evaluated the operator based on practical experience at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Blazer Building, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340510882.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.