DES PLAINES, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JZ ROOFING OF CHICAGO, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JZ ROOFING OF CHICAGO, INC. in 1272 MINER ST., DES PLAINES, IL 60016 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340512433.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JZ ROOFING OF CHICAGO, INC.
- Site address
- 1272 MINER ST.
- City
- DES PLAINES
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60016
- Mailing
- 5526 N. ELSTON, CHICAGO, IL 60630
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- May 28, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: a) On or about April 3, 2015, employees were exposed to electrical shock while working in close proximity to a 120/240 volt power line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B12
- Issued
- May 28, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails. a) On or about April 3, 2015, the employer provided for employee use an aluminum ladder for roofing work in close proximity to a 120/240 volt power line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B04
- Issued
- May 28, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels by personal fall arrest systems, covers or guardrail systems erected around such holes: a) Employees were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately one story to the lower level while performing roofing work around unguarded skylights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- May 28, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: a) Employees were not protected from the hazard of falling while performing roofing work on a flat roof of an existing commercial building approximately 12.7 feet high.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) The employer provided for employee use an extension ladder which did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at JZ Roofing of Chicago, INC.
View JZ Roofing of Chicago, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340512433.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.