Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JZ ROOFING OF CHICAGO, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JZ ROOFING OF CHICAGO, INC. in 1272 MINER ST., DES PLAINES, IL 60016 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340512433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JZ Roofing of Chicago, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JZ Roofing of Chicago, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1272 MINER ST.
City
DES PLAINES
State
IL
ZIP
60016
Mailing
5526 N. ELSTON, CHICAGO, IL 60630
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1):  Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:      a)  On or about April 3, 2015,  employees were exposed to electrical shock while working in close proximity to a 120/240 volt power line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B12

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
1926.1053(b)(12):  Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails.   a)  On or about April 3, 2015, the employer provided for employee use an aluminum ladder for roofing work in close proximity to a 120/240 volt power line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i):  Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels by personal fall arrest systems, covers or guardrail systems erected around such holes:      a)  Employees were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately one story to the lower level while performing roofing work around unguarded skylights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):  Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system:      a)  Employees were not protected from the hazard of falling while performing roofing work on a flat roof of an existing commercial building approximately 12.7 feet high.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:     a)  The employer provided for employee use an extension ladder which did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2000

View JZ Roofing of Chicago, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340512433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.