Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COYLE TRUCKING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COYLE TRUCKING, INC. in 260 ROUTE 519, EIGHTY FOUR, PA 15330 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 340571587.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coyle Trucking, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coyle Trucking, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
260 ROUTE 519
City
EIGHTY FOUR
State
PA
ZIP
15330
Mailing
260 ROUTE 519, EIGHTY FOUR, PA 15330
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,547 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc.:    (a)  Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, the approximately 4 1/2 foot deep service pit that employees use to work on trucks was not fitted with a cover nor guardrails when not in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1547
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,547 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:      (a)  Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, the employer did not have a lockout/tagout program.  Employees repair trucks daily and are exposed to hazards that would be eliminated by lockout/tagout of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1547
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:   (a)  Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, the company did not develop lockout/tagout procedures for when employees work at repairing trucks and or trailers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
Jun 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:   (a)  Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, the employer did not train its employees in the purpose and function of the lockout/tagout program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
May 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,160 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:       (a)  Plant:  On or about April 20, 2015, the Guardian 3/4 hp pedestal drill press was not anchored to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1160
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
May 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,146 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     (a) Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, there were unguarded (non cutting) portions of the Central Machinery horizontal band saw blade.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1146
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.176 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2015
Abate by
May 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:   (a)  Facility:  On or about April 20, 2015, the "homemade" truck tire storage rack that was mounted to the wall was not designed and installed in accordance with plans designed by an engineer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Coyle Trucking, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340571587.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.