DURHAM, NH —
OSHA Inspection: CLINT FORREST
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLINT FORREST in 49 MAIN ST., DURHAM, NH 03824 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340585298.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLINT FORREST
- Site address
- 49 MAIN ST.
- City
- DURHAM
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03824
- Mailing
- BOX 221, YORK HARBOR, ME 03911
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. 3rd Floor - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from falls of approximately 10 feet when a wall opening next to the rear stairwell was left unguarded.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1052 B01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(b)(1): Foot traffic was not prohibited on stairways where the treads and/or landings of pan stairs were to be filled in with concrete or other material at a later date and stairs were not temporarily fitted with wood or other solid material at least to the top edge of each pan: a. Front Stairwell - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from tripping hazards when pan stairs that were yet to be filled in were used to access the second and third floors and were not fully supplied with a temporary solid material. b. Rear Stairwell - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from tripping hazards when pan stairs that were yet to be filled in were used to access the second and third floors and were not fully supplied with a temporary solid material.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: a. Front Stairwell - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from fall hazards when a stairway used to access the second and third floors was not equipped with handrails. b. Rear Stairwell - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from fall hazards when a stairway used to access the second and third floors was not equipped with handrails.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. Rear Stairwell - Employees and subcontractors were not protected from fall hazards when a stairway used to access the second and third floors was not equipped with a stairrail system along the unprotected side.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. Roof Hatch - Employees and subcontractors accessing the roof through a hatch were not protected from falls of approximately 12 feet when a single section of an aluminum extension ladder only reached the base of the hatch, requiring employees and subcontractors to use the roof joists as footing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Clint Forrest
View Clint Forrest's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340585298.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.