Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SP PLUS CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SP PLUS CORPORATION in 50 PARK ROW WEST, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 340622554.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SP Plus Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SP Plus Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SP PLUS CORPORATION
Site address
50 PARK ROW WEST
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02903
Mailing
371 DORCHESTER AVENUE, BOSTON, MA 02127
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561790
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use:    Facility: Where the employer issued respirators to protect employees from the effects of contaminants generated during cleaning and maintenance activities, the employer did not develop and implement a written respirator program with the required elements outlined in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) through (ix).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Facility: When employees were assigned to wear half-mask elastomeric respirators as protection against contaminants, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and provide an appropriate respirator based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker is exposed and workplace and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:    Worksite: When employees were issued half-mask elastomeric respirators as protection against respirable dust and potential carbon monoxide exposure, the employer chose the incorrect respirator and cartridge.  The cartridge used was for protection against Organic Vapor exposures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area.  Employee training shall include at least:    (3)(iii): The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used:    Worksite: Employees were not instructed to recognize, and avoid unsafe, conditions when using gasoline-powered equipment to perform cleaning operations in the interior of a parking garage when:    1) Employees operating this equipment were exposed to the hazardous exhaust by-products generated with the equipment used in an enclosed area.  The employees were not trained to ensure that available, employer-owned exhaust fans were activated and operating effectively prior to and during the use of the gasoline-powered machinery throughout the project;    2) Employees who were assigned the use of Carbon Monoxide monitors did not carry these on their person when operating gasoline-powered equipment in an enclosed garage area.  These monitors were left in their vehicles, or other remote locations, and the employees had no means of alerting themselves and each other when ambient Carbon Monoxide levels reached dangerous levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4000

View SP Plus Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340622554.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.