Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEAFORD ICE, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SEAFORD ICE, INC. in 24483 SUSSEX HIGHWAY, SEAFORD, DE 19973 (NAICS 453998). OSHA activity number 340662998.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Seaford ICE, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seaford ICE, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SEAFORD ICE, INC.
Site address
24483 SUSSEX HIGHWAY
City
SEAFORD
State
DE
ZIP
19973
Mailing
24483 SUSSEX HIGHWAY, SEAFORD, DE 19973
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
453998
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $4,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - On or about May 28, 2015, the employer failed to establish a Lock out/Tag out program with procedures for the control of energy, periodic inspections and training to ensure employees were protected before starting servicing or maintenance on machines or equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $4,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):(a)     a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Ice bagging machine, Bagging Area, Line 1 - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to guard the horizontal belt in the mechanism which dispenses bag ties, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards. The employees were approximately 2 feet from the unguarded belt.    b) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Ice bagging machine, Bagging Area, Line 2- Line 1- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to guard the horizontal belt in the mechanism which dispenses bag ties, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards. The employees were approximately 2 feet from the unguarded belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Ice bagging machine, Bagging Area, Back of Ice machine 1- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to guard the vertical belt in the ice machine, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards. The employees walk approximately 2 feet from the unguarded belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o)   a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Ice bagging machine, Bagging Area, Line 1- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to guard the pulley in the mechanism which dispenses bag ties, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards. The employees were approximately 2 feet from the unguarded pulley.  b) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Ice bagging machine, Bagging Area, Line 2- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to guard the pulley in the mechanism which dispenses bag ties, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards. The employees were approximately 2 feet from the unguarded pulley.  c) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Bagging Area, back of the ice bagging machine- On or about August 19, 2015 the employer failed to guard the pulley behind the bagging machine, exposing employees to potential amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,850 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings shall be effectively closed.    a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - Outside the "Gantry Room"- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not close unused opening in cabinets, exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.305 B02

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $4,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:     a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - Bagging Area - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not provide covers for electrical boxes in the bagging area, exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE- On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program which complies with recognition of hazardous conditions, training, and avoidance of hazardous condition with respect of ammonia and bleach.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication training program. The employees did not have information on the chemicals, safety data sheets, labeling of materials, methods and observations to detect the release of ammonia, the physical and health hazards of ammonia and bleach, and the measures employees can take to protect themselves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $53,900 · Current $25,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by an unguarded operation of the rotating parts of a screw conveyor in the gantry room.    a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, Gantry room - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer failed to ensure that the guard on a screw conveyor was on at all times, exposing an employee to amputation and crushing hazards when he came in contact with the moving screw conveyor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $25000
  • — Z (W) $53900

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment   a) 24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - On or about May 28, 2015, the employer failed to assess the workplace to determine which hazards were present, such as corrosive bleach that would necessitate the use of personal protective equipment such chemical resistant gloves and eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Services, feeders, and branch circuits. Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident.   a)  24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not mark the purpose of each disconnect in the circuit breaker box outside the "gantry room".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 A02 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i)(B): Temporary wiring was used for a period exceeding 90 days.  a)  24483 Sussex Highway, Seaford, DE, block ice machine - On or about May 28, 2015 the employer did not install permanent wiring where needed, but used a flexible cord for a period of 2 years, exposing the employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Seaford ICE, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340662998.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.