Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRONTLINE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FRONTLINE INTERNATIONAL, INC. in 187 ASCOT PKWY, CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 340682574.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frontline International, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frontline International, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
187 ASCOT PKWY
City
CUYAHOGA FALLS
State
OH
ZIP
44223
Mailing
187 ASCOT PKWY, CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333318
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Abate by
Aug 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  On July 7, 2015, the welder was exposed to continuous noise levels at 79.8% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dbA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 422 minute sampling period.  Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 58 minutes not sampled. 89.3 dBA
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Abate by
Aug 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  On or about July 7, 2015, the employer did not keep surfaces, such as but not limited to, walls and floors free from the accumulation of combustible MDI overspray.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Abate by
Aug 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:   On or about June 5, 2015, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Abate by
Aug 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  On or about July 7, 2015, the employer did not provide nitrile gloves for employees who handle chemicals such as MDI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about June 5, 2015, the employer did not provide annual training on portable fire extinguishers when available for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a.) On or about June 5, 2015, the Jet Bandsaw SN#0805310 in the manufacturing area used to cut metal was not properly guarded. Employees were exposed to 4.5 inches of unused portion of the saw blade on the left and 4 inches on the right when operating the equipment.  b.) On or about June 5, 2015, the Proman Roller Model MCA2017 in the manufacturing area used to roll metal was not properly guarded. Employees were exposed to rotating parts when operating the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Abate by
Aug 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or about June 5, 2015 the employer did not provide employees with Appendix D of the respiratory standard when voluntarily using N-95 filtering face piece respirators while spraying MDI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:  On or about June 5, 2015, the employer did not have certifications for a forklift operator that contained the date of training, the name of the operator, date of the evaluation, and identity of the person performing the training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about June 5, 2015, the company did not develop a written hazard communication program at the site. Employees are working with hazardous chemicals such, but not limited to, welding gases and MDI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340682574.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.