Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE ESCALANTE FRAMING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE ESCALANTE FRAMING in 4019 VANCE JACKSON RD., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340697036.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Escalante Framing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Escalante Framing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4019 VANCE JACKSON RD.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78213
Mailing
239 BURWOOD LN., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to thermal burns and the employer did not ensure that steam pipes were covered to prevent employees from making contact with the bare pipes:   Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while operating a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, without a seatbelt.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 10 feet, while working from a platform being elevated by a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, while the platform was not designed by a qualified person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v):  The employer used forklifts to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:  Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 10 feet, while working from a platform being elevated by a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, that was not secured to the lifting device.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than 10 feet, while working from a platform being elevated by a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, while the platform did not have standard guardrails installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedure(s) to control or minimize those hazards:   Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 10 feet, while working from a platform being elevated by a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, while not being trained on fall hazard recognition.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2015
Abate by
Jun 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.602(d):  The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by 1910.178(l) of this chapter:  Outside of Building #2:  On or about June 8, 2015, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while operating a powered industrial truck, JBL Model 8040, without being trained and certified by the current employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Jose Escalante Framing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340697036.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.