Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALEXANDRO DA SILVA

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ALEXANDRO DA SILVA in 2050 FRANKFORD AVE., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19126 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340738517.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alexandro DA Silva — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alexandro DA Silva is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALEXANDRO DA SILVA
Site address
2050 FRANKFORD AVE.
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19126
Mailing
92 SUMO VILLAGE COURT, NEWARK, NJ 07114
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a) Jobsite - Employees were performing carpentry operations from a temporary elevated work platform that was not fully decked or planked between the front and rear edges.  This condition exposed the employees to fall hazards of approximately twenty-five (25) feet above ground level.  Observed on or about June 16, 2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  a) Jobsite - A ladder or other safe means of access was not provided to employees working on the temporary elevated platform.  Employees were required to climb out of a wall opening and descend more that two (2) feet to the working level.  This condition exposed the employees to fall hazards in excess of twenty (20) feet.  Observed on or about June 16, 2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Dec 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:  a) Jobsite - The temporary elevated work platform was not erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person.  The temporary work platform was constructed of various size pieces of lumber and was not complete.  In addition, the temporary elevated work platform contained numerous deficiencies, including but not limited to, insufficient planking, unsafe access, and lack of fall protection.  Observed on or about June 16, 2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  a) Jobsite - Employees performing carpentry operations from the temporary elevated work platform were exposed to fall hazards of approximately twenty-five (25) feet without the use of fall protection.  Observed on or about June 16, 2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system:  a) Jobsite - Employees working in the Genie Boom aerial lift were exposed to fall hazards of approximately twenty (20) feet without the benefit of a personal fall arrest system or personal fall restraint system.  Observed on or about June 16, 2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) Jobsite, 2050 Frankford Ave., Phila., PA - Employees performing framing operations approximately twenty five (25) feet above ground level were not protected from fall hazards by use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  Observed on or about 6/16/15
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6300

View Alexandro DA Silva's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340738517.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.