CHICAGO, IL —
OSHA Inspection: TAMAY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAMAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 3258 N. OAK PARK AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60634 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340795236.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TAMAY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 3258 N. OAK PARK AVE.
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60634
- Mailing
- 2049 N. LEAMINGTON AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60639
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswain's chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold, was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: a) The employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while performing roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold platform elevated approximately 22.2 feet above the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor were the employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 25 feet while replacing the roof to a single family home.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 III
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(iii): Each employee on a crawling board (chicken ladder) was not protected by a personal fall arrest system, a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity), or by a three-fourth inch (1.9 cm) diameter grabline or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside each crawling board: a) Empoyees were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 13 feet while utilizing a crawling board (chicken ladder) while performing roofing work.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.452 M02
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(m)(2): Crawling boards were not secured to the roof by ridge hooks or by means that meet equivalent criteria (e.g., strength and durability): a) Employees engaged in roofing activity were working from the crawling boards that were not secured to the roof by the ridge hooks.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m): a) Employees were working from a ladder jack scaffold platform that was approximately 22.2 feet above the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators: a) Employees were observed using a material hoist that was located on the north side of the house as a ladder to access the roof that was approximately 13 feet high. b) Employees were observed working from and utilizing for access to the roof a section of a material hoist approximately 11.3 feet high on the east side of the house.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Tamay Construction, INC.
View Tamay Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340795236.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.