TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: MARMOL HAWAII
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MARMOL HAWAII in 145 TUN JOAQUIN GUERRERO ST, TAMUNING, GU 96931 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 340795434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARMOL HAWAII
- Site address
- 145 TUN JOAQUIN GUERRERO ST
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96931
- Mailing
- 759 PUULOA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI 96819
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423320
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. On July 23, 2015, the employer did not institute a hearing conservation program for employees operating and/or working around the bridge stone cutter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
8530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a. On July 23, 2015, a Red Diode Class 3b Laser was used without eye protection, exposing employees to permanent eye damage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. On July 23, 2015, a written respiratory program was not developed for employees using respirators to protect against crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. On July 23, 2015, a 3M half mask respirator was being used without administering a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a. On July 23, 2015, a 3M half mask respirator was used without administering a fit test to ensure a good seal to protect employees from crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a. On July 23, 2015, a 3M half mask respirator was not properly stored to prevent damage and contamination from silica dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a. On July 23, 2015, employees using a 3M half mask respirator were not trained on the use, care and limitations of the half mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H04
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(4): Respirators that failed an inspection or were otherwise found to be defective were not removed from service and discarded or repaired: a. On July 23, 2015, a 3M half mask respirator with a missing inhalation valve, was used by an employee while grinding counter tops containing crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $1700
More inspections at Marmol Hawaii
View Marmol Hawaii's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423320)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340795434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.