Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TELEFAST INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TELEFAST INDUSTRIES, INC. in 777 WEST BAGLEY RD, BEREA, OH 44017 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 340813872.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Telefast Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Telefast Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
777 WEST BAGLEY RD
City
BEREA
State
OH
ZIP
44017
Mailing
777 WEST BAGLEY RD, BEREA, OH 44017
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $5,500

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform troubleshooting and maintenance on machinery where the potential of live voltage up to and including 480VAC were trained in safe work practices.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5500
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.333 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform troubleshooting and maintenance on machinery where the potential of live voltage up to and including 480VAC utilized safe work practices.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform troubleshooting and maintenance on equipment wore insulated gloves and arc rated clothing to protect against contact with live voltage/arc flashes while working on up to and including 3 phase 480VAC .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.335 A01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform troubleshooting and maintenance on equipment to include changing fuses wore head and ear protection to protect against contact with live voltage/arc flashes while working on up to and including 3 phase 480VAC .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face:     On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform troubleshooting and maintenance on equipment to include changing fuses wore full face protection to protect against an arc flash while working with live voltage while working on up to and including 3 phase 480VAC.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Repeat Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that have to access the side panel of the M-Series Nut Tappers to remove jams utilized lockout/tagout.   Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 990085, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $0
  • — C (R) $27500
  • — Z (R) $27500

1910.147 D04 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that have to access the side panel of the M-Series Nut Tappers to remove jams placed a lock on the energy isolation knife switch.    Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 990085, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $0
  • — C (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.147 D06

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $27,500
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5)(i): All potentially hazardous stored or residual energy was not relieved, disconnected, restrained or otherwise rendered safe after the application of lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices:        On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees that have to access the side panel of the M-Series Nut Tappers to remove jams verified no hazardous energy sources were present prior to beginning work.    Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 990085, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $27500
  • — C (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.212 A01

Deleted Repeat Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating Waterbury Thread Roller, WB20, were protected against contact with the moving parts by utilizing effective machine guarding.  Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.212(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 991341, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017 .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $0
  • — C (R) $27500
  • — Z (R) $27500

1910.212 A03 II

Repeat Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $27,500 · Current $27,500
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The  point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded:    a. During the week of July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Waterbury #3 Trimmer were protected against contact with the ram by utilizing effective machine guarding.    b. During the week of July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Waterbury #1 trimmer were protected against contact with the ram by utilizing effective machine guarding.    c. On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Grob Vertical Band Saw, serial number 798, were protected against contact with the unused portion of the saw blade by utilizing effective machine guarding.     Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.212(a)(3)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 991341, citation number 01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017 .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $27500
  • — C (R) $27500
  • — Z (R) $27500

1910.219 F01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $27,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees working on the Waterbury Thread Roller, WB20, were protected against contact with the automatic feeder chain and sprocket which was located approximately 6 feet above ground level.     Telefast Industries, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.219 (f)(3), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 991341, citation number 01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on October 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 777 West Bagley Road, Berea, Ohio 44017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $0
  • — C (R) $27500
  • — Z (R) $27500

1910.179 K01 I D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
1910.179(k)(1)(i)(d): Limit switches, locking and safety devices shall be tested daily:    On or about July 30, 2015 the employer failed to ensure daily upper limit switch checks were performed for the ABUS 5 ton overhead crane, serial number GM1050H6194106EUS in the production area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:    On or about July 30, 2015 the employer failed to ensure certified hook inspections were performed and documented for the ABUS 5 ton overhead crane, serial number GM1050H6194106EUS in the production area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:    On or about July 30, 2015 the employer failed to ensure certified chain inspections were performed and documented for the ABUS 5 ton overhead crane, serial number GM1050H6194106EUS in the production area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    On or about July 30, 2015, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details of the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harmonization System(GHS).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Telefast Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340813872.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.