Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HECTOR RODRIGUEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HECTOR RODRIGUEZ in 11707 MAIN ST, HUNTLEY, IL 60142 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340813997.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hector Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hector Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HECTOR RODRIGUEZ
Site address
11707 MAIN ST
City
HUNTLEY
State
IL
ZIP
60142
Mailing
327 MCCLURE AVE APT. 6, ELGIN, IL 60123
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.     Hector Rodriguez dba Hector Rodriguez,  failed to submit documents to OSHA verifying that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                            2a,2b,2c,4,5a,5b,5c,6             10/29/2015
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  The employer failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Hector Rodriguez dba Hector Rodriguez, failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                           1,3                                           10/29/2015     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided:  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was not wearing protective clothing, thereby exposing the employee to skin absorption of Portland cement.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Dec 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  At the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for an employee who was required to wear a full face respirator to protect the employee from concrete and cement dust particulates generated during tuck pointing and grinding operations, exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Dec 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   At the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for an employee prior to being required to wear a full face respirator to protect the employee from concrete and cement dust particulates generated during tuck pointing and grinding operations, exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Dec 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a full face respirator while performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was not fit tested prior to initial use, thereby exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Nov 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   At the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to maintain, implement, and develop a written hazard communication program. An employee was exposed to eye, skin contact and respiratory tract chemical hazards associated with chemicals, such as but not limited to silica and Portland cement dust.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  At the above addressed jobsite, the ladder jack scaffold in use was not designed by a qualified person. An employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from the ladder jack scaffold was exposed to injuries from falls and structural collapse.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide:  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold platform that was ten (10) inches wide, exposing the employee to a fall of greater than twenty-five (25) feet.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m):  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold with platforms greater than twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, thereby exposing the employee to injuries from a fall and structural collapse of the scaffold.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another:  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was working from a ladder jack scaffold with bridged platforms, thereby exposing the employee to injuries from a fall and structural collapse.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2015
Abate by
Oct 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold, greater than twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, was exposed to injuries from falls.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Hector Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340813997.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.