HUNTLEY, IL —
OSHA Inspection: HECTOR RODRIGUEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HECTOR RODRIGUEZ in 11707 MAIN ST, HUNTLEY, IL 60142 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340813997.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HECTOR RODRIGUEZ
- Site address
- 11707 MAIN ST
- City
- HUNTLEY
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60142
- Mailing
- 327 MCCLURE AVE APT. 6, ELGIN, IL 60123
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. Hector Rodriguez dba Hector Rodriguez, failed to submit documents to OSHA verifying that each of the following cited violations had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01 2a,2b,2c,4,5a,5b,5c,6 10/29/2015
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected: Hector Rodriguez dba Hector Rodriguez, failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01 1,3 10/29/2015 In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided: At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was not wearing protective clothing, thereby exposing the employee to skin absorption of Portland cement. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: At the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for an employee who was required to wear a full face respirator to protect the employee from concrete and cement dust particulates generated during tuck pointing and grinding operations, exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: At the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for an employee prior to being required to wear a full face respirator to protect the employee from concrete and cement dust particulates generated during tuck pointing and grinding operations, exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: At the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a full face respirator while performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was not fit tested prior to initial use, thereby exposing the employee to cardio pulmonary distress and silica exposure through inhalation. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: At the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to maintain, implement, and develop a written hazard communication program. An employee was exposed to eye, skin contact and respiratory tract chemical hazards associated with chemicals, such as but not limited to silica and Portland cement dust. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: At the above addressed jobsite, the ladder jack scaffold in use was not designed by a qualified person. An employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from the ladder jack scaffold was exposed to injuries from falls and structural collapse. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 B02 I
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide: At the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold platform that was ten (10) inches wide, exposing the employee to a fall of greater than twenty-five (25) feet. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m): At the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold with platforms greater than twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, thereby exposing the employee to injuries from a fall and structural collapse of the scaffold. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another: At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations was working from a ladder jack scaffold with bridged platforms, thereby exposing the employee to injuries from a fall and structural collapse. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: At the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing tuck pointing and cement grinding operations from a ladder jack scaffold, greater than twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, was exposed to injuries from falls. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Hector Rodriguez
View Hector Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340813997.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.