Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BRAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BRAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS in 10207 FM 1942, MONT BELVIEU, TX 77580 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 340850700.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brand Energy Solutions — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brand Energy Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10207 FM 1942
City
MONT BELVIEU
State
TX
ZIP
77580
Mailing
1830 JASMINE DR., PASADENA, TX 77503
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
104
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2015
Abate by
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(iii): With respect to the tasks listed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), where lead was present, until the employer performed an exposure assessment as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and documented that the employee performing the listed tasks was not exposed in excess of 500 micrograms per meter cubed, the employer did not treat the employee as if the employee was exposed to lead in excess of 500 micrograms per meter cubed and did not implement employee protective measures as prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v):    (a) at Enterprise, Splitter One Unit, Splitter One Senior Column, where lead containing coatings or paint were present and employees were engaged in cleanup activities where dry expendable abrasives were used. An initial exposure assessment was not conducted and the employee protective measures as prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v) were not implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.62 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2015
Abate by
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to coveralls or similar full-body work clothing:    (a) at Enterprise, Splitter One Unit, Splitter One Senior Column, where lead containing coatings or paint were present and employees were engaged in cleanup activities where dry expendable abrasives were used.  Employees were not provided with full body protective clothing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 H03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2015
Abate by
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(3): Shoveling, dry or wet sweeping, and brushing were used when vacuuming or other equally effective methods were effective:    (a)  at Enterprise, Splitter One Unit, Splitter One Senior Column, where lead containing coatings or paint were present and employees were engaged in cleanup activities where dry expendable abrasives were used.  Employees shoveled spent blasting media that contained lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 I02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2015
Abate by
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(iii): The employer did not ensure that employees did not leave the workplace wearing any protective clothing or equipment that was required to be worn during the work shift:      (a) at Enterprise, Splitter One Unit, Splitter One Senior Column, where lead containing coatings or paint were present and employees were engaged in cleanup activities where dry expendable abrasives were used. Employees wore their work clothes home.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Brand Energy Solutions's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340850700.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.