OSHA Inspection: MOBILE CONCEPTS BY SCOTTY

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 11, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that includes the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) through (ix) with worksite specific procedures for employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators in the workplace.

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 1, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators for the application of 4,4'-Methylenediphenyl diisocyante were provided a medical evaluation prior to their use in the workplace.

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 1, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provided effective training to employees who are required to use respirators:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to wear tight-fitting respiratory protection in the workplace.

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 11, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposure to 4,4'-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate.

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 11, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer's written hazard communication program did not specify how the criteria specified in paragraph (h) (employee information and training) will be met for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals in the workplace, such as, but not limited to Gatorhyde CG (Parts A and B) (4,4'-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate).

Issued

Feb 5, 2016

Abate by

Mar 24, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) In the facility, on or about August 19, 2015 - The employer did not ensure that employees were provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used in the workplace, such as, but not limited to Gatorhyde CG (4,4'-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate).