Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KNOTS 2U, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KNOTS 2U, LTD. in 709 AIRPORT ROAD, BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 340886795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Knots 2U, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Knots 2U, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KNOTS 2U, LTD.
Site address
709 AIRPORT ROAD
City
BURLINGTON
State
WI
ZIP
53105
Mailing
709 AIRPORT ROAD, BURLINGTON, WI 53105
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 IV A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a): 29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C), were not kept in covered containers when not actually in use:      (a)     The plastic pails containing acetone used in the lay up area for cleaning tools had no covers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.125 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.125(a): Dip tank was not made of noncombustible material:  (a)     The plastic pails containing acetone used in the lay up area for cleaning tools were combustible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 E02 IV D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(d): Flammable liquids were not drawn from or transferred into vessels, containers, or portable tanks within a building only through a closed piping system, from safety cans, by means of a device drawing through the top, or from a container or portable tanks by gravity through an approved self-closing valve:    (a)     The 55-gallon drum of vinylester resin was fitted with a non-self-closing valve.      (b)     The 55-gallon drum of gel coat resin was fitted with a non-self-closing valve.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 M01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(m)(1): Spraying operations involving the use of organic peroxides and other dual component coatings were not conducted in approved sprinklered spray booths meeting the requirements of this section:    (a)     The spray booth where the gel coat was sprayed onto molds had no approved sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a)     There was no written respiratory protection program established for employees in the production area who wear respirators for protection from organic vapors and respirable particulates while spraying gel coat and trimming parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated - Total Dust listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8-hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15 mg/m3:    (a)     The trimmer in the trimming room was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated - Total Dust at an 8-hour time weighted average of 31.0 mg/m3, approximately 2.0 times the limit of 15.0 mg/m3.  This limit is established to prevent respiratory irritation.  The samples were collected on September 29, 2015 during a 476 minute sampling period.  Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 4 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  (a)     The trimmer in the trimming room was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated - Total Dust at an 8-hour time weighted average of 31.0 mg/m3, approximately 2.0 times the limit of 15.0 mg/m3.  This limit is established to prevent respiratory irritation.  The samples were collected on September 29, 2015 during a 476 minute sampling period.  Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 4 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a)     There was no adequate eyewash facility available in the production area where employees handle acetone, vinyl ester resin and MEK-peroxide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.304 G06 VI

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi): Exposed noncurrent-carrying metal parts of cord- and plug-connected equipment that could have become energized were not grounded:      (a)     In the finishing room the two residential-type, metal window box fans were not grounded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $510
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)     There was no written chemical hazard communication program developed that addressed chemicals handled by employees such as Univar acetone, Norox MEKP-925 initiator, and Interplastic vinyl ester resin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:    (a)     The containers in the production area that contained acetone, MEK-peroxide and vinylester resin were not identified with information such as a product identifier, a signal word, a hazard statement, a pictogram, and a precautionary statement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:  (a)     There was no written emergency action plan developed to protect employees in foreseeable emergencies such as fire, tornado, and workplace violence.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B07 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i):  Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:    (a)     The small Cutler-Hammer 30 amp disconnect box had an unused conduit opening on the right side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1020 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(iii): Employees were not informed upon first entering into employment and/or at least annually thereafter of their right to access their medical and/or exposure records:  (a)     There was no awareness training done for employees to inform them of their right to access medical and monitoring records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):    (a)     The safety data sheets for chemicals, such as acetone and vinylester, resin used by employees were maintained in the company office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2015
Abate by
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(i): The employer did not provide information to the employees on the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200:  (a)     There was no training or communication done for employees to inform them of the requirements of the OSHA chemical hazard communication standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Knots 2U, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340886795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.