DANBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FAIRFIELD PROCESSING CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FAIRFIELD PROCESSING CORPORATION in 88 ROSE HILL ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06810 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 340907831.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAIRFIELD PROCESSING CORPORATION
- Site address
- 88 ROSE HILL ROAD
- City
- DANBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06810
- Mailing
- 88 ROSE HILL ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339999
- Employees
- 74
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels : Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 Each employee covered under the Hearing Conservation Program did not receive annual audiograms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 Each employee who are covered under the Hearing Conservation Program did not receive training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.95 K02
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The hearing conservation training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program: Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 Each employees covered under the Hearing Conservation Program was not provided with annual training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 A written certification that identifies the workplace hazard assessment including the workplace evaluated, the person certifying the evaluation, the date of the hazard assessment and the identifies the assessment as a certification for personal protective equipment (PPE), where hazards such as, but not limited to, poly dust, noise, and propane, was not completed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1350
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.178 Q01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel: Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 The parking brake on the Toyota propane powdered industrial truck was not adjusted properly and working ineffectively whereby the powered industrial truck traveled when the parking brake was engaged.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2700
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $0 Reduced
83208330
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. Location: 88 Rose Hill Road, Danbury, CT 06810 On or about August 18, 2015, the employer did not record an incident on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2015 whereby an employee sustained loss of consciousness due to heat related exposure. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $900
More inspections at Fairfield Processing Corporation
View Fairfield Processing Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339999)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340907831.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.