Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARCTIC GLACIER U.S.A., INC. in 35 ENGEL STREET, HICKSVILLE, NY 11801 (NAICS 312113). OSHA activity number 340909282.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arctic Glacier U.S.A., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arctic Glacier U.S.A., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 ENGEL STREET
City
HICKSVILLE
State
NY
ZIP
11801
Mailing
365 BLOOMFIELD AVENUE UNIT 3B, MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
312113
Employees
37
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.  (a) Machinery Room - On, or about September 17, 2015, the employer did not document that the door leading from the ice making room into the machinery room, which was not marked with a restricted access sign, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) such as, but not limited to IIAR 2-2008 Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems, Section 13.1.2 Accessibility, Para. 13.1.2.4, which requires access to refrigerating machinery rooms to be restricted to authorized personnel; and for each door to be clearly marked with permanent signs posted at each entrance indicating this restriction.  (b) Machinery Room - On, or about September 17, 2015, the employer did not document that the machinery room doors that were not tight-fitting, in that they were not equipped with seals, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) such as, but not limited to IIAR 2-2008 Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems, Section 13.1.10 Entrances and Exits, Para. 13.1.10.1, which requires each refrigeration machinery room to be equipped with a tight-fitting door or doors that open outward and are self-closing if they open into the building.   (c) Machinery Room - On, or about September 17, 2015, the employer did not document that the mechanical ventilation system inlet air obtained from the loading dock area where vehicles with internal combustion engines were operated and carbon monoxide could exist, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) such as, but not limited to IIAR 2-2008 Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems, Section 13.3 Ventilation, Para. 13.3.3.2, which requires the ambient inlet air to be clean and uncontaminated.  (d) Machinery Room - On, or about September 17, 2015, the employer did not document that the machinery room emergency ventilation system exhaust fan that discharged horizontally, complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) such as, but not limited to IIAR 2-2008 Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems, Section 13.3 Ventilation, Para. 13.3.7.1, which requires all exhaust fans to discharge vertically with a minimum discharge velocity of 2500 feet per minute (FPM).   Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this violation, in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 H02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Abate by
Mar 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(i): The employer, when selecting a contractor, did not obtain and evaluate information regarding the contract employer's safety performance and program:  (a) Covered Process Equipment - On, or about September 24, 2015, Arctic Glacier U.S.A., Inc. failed to evaluate the safety and health programs of mechanical contractor, Hallam Engineering and Construction Corporation. The mechanical contractor lacked safety programs such as, but not limited to hazard communication and respiratory protection.  Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this violation, in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 H02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(iv): The employer did not implement safe work practices consistent with paragraph (f)(4) of this section to control the entrance, presence and exit of contract employers and contract employees in the covered process areas.  (a) Process Areas - The employer developed, but failed to implement their safe work practices for controlling outside contractor access to covered process areas within the facility. Employees from Industrial Refrigeration, Inc. and Hallam Engineering & Construction Corporation accessed covered process areas such as, but not limited to the machinery room, ice making room, and roof during the performance of inspection, maintenance, and repair work on process equipment that contained anhydrous ammonia, without notifying an Arctic Glacier U.S.A., Inc. employee of their presence; or by signing in/out on the visitors log. OSHA documented eight specific instances that occurred between September 11, 2015 and January 14, 2016.   Note: Abatement for this violation was previously documented; therefore, the employer is not required to submit abatement certification or documentation for this violation in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 I01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1): The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety review for new facilities and for modified facilities when the modification was significant enough to require a change in the process safety information.  (a) Covered Process  On, or about September 24, 2015, a pre-startup safety review was not performed after the stop valve, safety relief valves, and associated relief header vent line piping were upgraded on the H.A. Phillips & Co. recirculator pressure vessel, National Board # 14829 / Serial # 1453656_02; and prior to re-introducing anhydrous ammonia back into the process.     Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this violation, in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.305 C04

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface:  (a) Packaging Room, Line 6 - On, or about September 11, 2015, the electrical enclosure housing the on/off snap switch on the Hamer Automated Packaging System, Model # 125-5 / Serial # 15816063, did not have a faceplate cover installed over the opening.   Note: Abatement for this violation was previously documented; therefore, the employer is not required to submit abatement certification or documentation for this violation in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $1100
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.305 J02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location:   (a) Packaging Room, 300# Ice Block Line - On, or about October 5, 2015, the electrical outlet enclosures mounted on each of the Clinebell Equipment Co. Inc. Carving Block Machines were susceptible to coming into contact with water when electrical equipment such as, but not limited to submersible pumps were plugged into the outlets, because the equipment cord(s) prevented the covers from closing and creating a seal to prevent water intrusion.  Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this violation, in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.305 G02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Hard-service cord and junior hard-service cord No. 14 and larger were repaired by splicing, which did not retain the insulation, outer sheath properties, and usage characteristics of the cord being spliced.  (a) Packaging Room - On, or about September 11, 2015, the power cord on the Hamer Automated Packaging System's wire tie drive motor, Model # 125-5 / Serial # 15816063, was spliced together using flexible cords and wire nuts, which did not retain the insulation and outer sheath properties of the cord.      (b) Packaging Room  On or about September 11, 2015, the power cord on the Hamer Automated Packaging System's ice bag conveyor belt drive motor, Model # 125-5 / Serial # 15816063, was spliced together using flexible cords and wire nuts, which did not retain the insulation and outer sheath properties of the cord.        Note: Abatement for this violation was previously documented; therefore, the employer is not required to submit abatement certification or documentation for this violation in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.37 B02

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $22,000 · Current $20,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  (a) Ice Making Room - On, or about September 17, 2015, the exit route door leading outside was not marked with an "Exit" sign.  (b) Ice Making Room  On, or about September 17, 2015, the exit route door leading to the loading dock area was not marked with an "Exit" sign.   Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this violation, in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.   Arctic Glacier U.S.A, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 623559, citation number 1, item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on September 24, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 500 Fenimore Street in Mamaroneck, NY 10543.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (R) $20000
  • — C (R) $22000
  • — Z (R) $22000

View Arctic Glacier U.S.A., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340909282.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.