Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GEORGIA WEB, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GEORGIA WEB, INC. in 5500 QUAKER ROAD, WRENS, GA 30833 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 340951797.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Georgia WEB, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Georgia WEB, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GEORGIA WEB, INC.
Site address
5500 QUAKER ROAD
City
WRENS
State
GA
ZIP
30833
Mailing
5500 QUAKER ROAD, WRENS, GA 30833
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326299
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.110 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(i): Containers in storage were not located so as to minimize exposure to excessive temperature rise, physical damage, or tampering from unauthorized persons:     a) At the production building, on or about September 29, 2015 and at times prior to, propane cylinders that were in storage were not protected from being tipped over, exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.110 F02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii): Liquefied petroleum gas container(s) stored inside were located near exits, stairways, or in areas normally used or intended for the safe exit of people:   a) At the production building, on or about September 29, 2015 and at times prior to, propane cylinders were stored near an exit door, exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer failed to supply employees who remove and install propane cylinders on forklifts with eye protection (i.e. safety glasses, goggles, or faceshield), exposing employees to potential eye injury resulting from exposure to propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer failed to supply employees who remove and install propane cylinders on forklifts with hand protection, exposing employees to skin injury from contact with liquid propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L03 I K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(K): 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(K): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive training on refueling:    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that forklift operators assigned to perform refueling operations were trained in safe operations including but not limited to wearing eye and hand protection when removing and installing propane cylinders on forklifts, exposing employees to skin burns from contact with liquid propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer did not certify the training of all employees who operated powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees that were handling/working with chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, exposing employees to eye/face and/or skin injuries and irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to September 29, 2015, the employer did not provide training pursuant to the Hazard Communication 2012 updates effective December 1, 2013 about the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, the labeling system for received containers, safety data sheets and on how employees can obtain/use the appropriate hazard information for employees working with chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Georgia WEB, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340951797.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.