Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PACTIV

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PACTIV in 7207 S. MASON, BEDFORD PARK, IL 60638 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 340966043.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pactiv — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pactiv is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PACTIV
Site address
7207 S. MASON
City
BEDFORD PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60638
Mailing
7207 S. MASON, BEDFORD PARK, IL 60638
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
260
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G05 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): "Mobile test van exception." Where mobile test vans are used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer shall obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level. Where baseline audiograms are obtained more than 6 months after the employee's first exposure at or above the action level, employees shall wear hearing protectors for any period exceeding six months after first exposure until the baseline audiogram is obtained.    On November 12, 2015, in the facility, temporary employees required to perform line packaging operations were exposed to noise above the action level. For example:    a). A temporary employee packaging at Line 102 was exposed to noise at an 8-hour time-weighted average of approximately 96.3 dBA (80 dB threshold) or equivalent 240 percent dose, during a 443 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure assumed for the minutes not sampled.  The employee had been working at the facility since August 21, 2013.    b). A temporary employee packaging at Line 108 was exposed to noise at an 8-hour time-weighted average of approximately 93.7 dBA (80 dB threshold), or equivalent 167 percent dose, during a 447 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure assumed for the minutes not sampled.  The employee had been working at the facility since May 23, 2013.    The employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of the employees first exposure at or above the action level of 82.1 dBA (12-hour TWA) or equivalent 50 percent dose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.95 I03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 260 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees shall be given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer.    On or about November 12, 2015, in the facility, temporary employees required to work at or near the production lines were exposed to daily noise levels between 92.9 and 96.3 decibels as an 8-hour time-weighted average.  The employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer.  Employees were provided with only one type hearing protector (foam plug) to select from.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.95 I04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 122 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(4): The employer shall provide training in the use and care of all hearing protectors provided to employees:  On or about November 12, 2015, in the facility, temporary employees required to work at or near the production lines were exposed to daily noise levels between 92.9 and 96.3 decibels as an 8-hour time-weighted average.  The employees were not provided training in the use and care of the required hearing protection (foam plug) provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 I05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 122 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(5): The employer shall ensure proper initial fitting and supervise the correct use of all hearing protectors:  On or about November 12, 2015, in the facility, temporary employees required to work at or near production lines were exposed to daily noise levels between 92.9 and 96.3 decibels as an 8-hour time-weighted average.  The employer did not ensure proper initial fitting of the required hearing protection (foam plug) provided and did not supervise the correct use of the hearing protector.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Pactiv's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340966043.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.