SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CRADDOCK CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CRADDOCK CONSTRUCTION in 8222 CITY BASE LANDING, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78223 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340971589.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRADDOCK CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 8222 CITY BASE LANDING
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78223
- Mailing
- 9827 POTRANCO ROAD 103, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78251
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.251 C05
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(5): U-bolt wire rope clip(s) used to form eyes did not conform to Table H-20 to determine number and spacing of clip(s): On or about October 6, 2015, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, when using a 5/8 inch wire rope as a horizontal lifeline that was terminated with only 2 U-bolt wire rope clips, while installing windows from a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.251 C05 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(5)(i): The U section of U-bolt wire rope clip(s) used to form eyes was not in contact with the dead end of the rope: On or about October 6, 2015, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, when using a 5/8 inch wire rope as a horizontal lifeline which had 2 U-bolt wire rope clips that were not in contact with the dead end of the rope, while installing windows from a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G03
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3): Personal fall arrest systems used on scaffolds were not attached by lanyard to a vertical lifeline, horizontal lifeline, or scaffold structural member: Front of building, SE Corner: On or about October 6, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 10 feet to the concrete ground below, in that employees wearing harnesses did not have their lanyards attached to the horizontal lifeline or the temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms: Front of building, SE Corner: On or about October 6, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 10 feet to the concrete ground below, from a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift that did not have guardrails installed on one of its four sides, while installing windows.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: Front of building, SE Corner: On or about October 6, 2015, employee(s) were exposed to a struck by falling objects hazard, from a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift that did not have toeboards installed around the perimeter, while installing windows.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used: Front of building, SE Corner: On or about October 6, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, from not being trained on how to properly wear a harness in that the leg straps were not buckled and the lanyards were not attached, while installing windows from a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG Rough Terrain Forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks: Front of building, SE Corner: On or about October 6, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, when the forklift operator left the cab and walked away, while two employees occupied a temporary elevated work platform supported by a Rough Terrain Forklift Truck (Model 10054) to install windows.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Craddock Construction
View Craddock Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340971589.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.