Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TURBO COMBUSTOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TURBO COMBUSTOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 3651 COMMERCE AVE, STUART, FL 34997 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 340989300.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turbo Combustor Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turbo Combustor Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3651 COMMERCE AVE
City
STUART
State
FL
ZIP
34997
Mailing
3651 COMMERCE AVE, STUART, FL 34997
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
350
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):      On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, although the employers policy contained some general procedures for control of hazardous energy relating to the hydraulic presses identified as Asset #132 and Asset #255, the procedures were not specific enough to clearly outline the scope , purpose, authorization, rules and/or techniques to be utilized by employees performing maintenance or servicing of equipment for the control of hazardous energy for the hydraulic presses identified as Asset #132 and Asset #255
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4900
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:    On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, according to the employer, it provided training on the purpose and use of the energy control program for maintenance personnel; however, this training was not provided to affected employees that operate the hydraulic presses identified as Asset #132 and Asset #255.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a. On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught by hazards while working with an HPM 45-87 hydraulic press break without point of operation guarding and/or alternate measures that provides effective protection.      b. On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to cuts and lacerations from flying chips while working with a SHARP-164L lathe without guarding.    c. On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to cuts and lacerations from flying chips while working with Bridgeport drill press TCT 163, Bridgeport drill press TCT 137, Lagune Republic FTU-2 drill press and Jones-Shipman 310T drill press without guarding.    d. On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employee was exposed to caught in hazard while working with HE&M H101-A1 horizontal band saw that lacked guarding for the unused portion of the cutting blade.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4900
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    On or about February 4, 2016 at the above addressed job site, employee was exposed to struck by hazard while working with a bench grinder (no manufacturer name, SN 89020) that lacked a tongue guard on its left side.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 D09 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i): The employer did not establish a die setting procedure for mechanical power press(es) that would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.217(c)  On or about February 4, 2016 at the above addressed job site, the employer did not establish a die setting procedure for Rousselle B1-90-4 mechanical power press, exposing employee to caught in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.217 D09 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(iv): Safety blocks were not used when mechanical power press die(s) were being adjusted or repaired in the press:  On or about February 4, 2016 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught by hazards when performing die adjustments and repairs on Rousselle B1-90-4 mechanical power press without the use of safety blocks.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 E01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): Records of mechanical power press inspections and the maintenance work performed were not maintained:  On or about February 4, 2016 at the above addressed job site, employer did not maintain records on inspections performed on Rouselle B1-90-4 mechanical power press.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about October 15, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program describing hazards associated to substances that contain chemicals such as but not limited to Cobalt, Nickel, Iron, Chromium, Tungsten and Manganese, for employees performing grinding and sanding on metal engine and combustor parts.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Turbo Combustor Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340989300.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.