AVON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: CASTLE CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CASTLE CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY in 33200 HEALTH CAMPUS BLVD, AVON, OH 44011 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341002863.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CASTLE CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY
- Site address
- 33200 HEALTH CAMPUS BLVD
- City
- AVON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44011
- Mailing
- 588 US ROUTE 250 E, ASHLAND, OH 44805
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 M05 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the controls neutralized, power was not shut off, and brakes set: On or about October 21, 2015, the employer did not ensure a Pettibone Traverse Lift rough terrain forklift, Model 1157, was attended by the operator while an employee was raised inside a work platform installing wood framing material during the construction of a senior living complex.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: On or about October 21, 2015, the employer did not ensure a work platform used by an employee to install wood framing material during the construction of a senior living complex was designed by a qualified person.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1200
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: On or about October 21, 2015, the employer did not ensure a work platform used by an employee to install wood framing material was attached to the forks of a Pettibone Traverse Lift rough terrain forklift, Model: 1157.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G03
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3): In addition to meeting the requirements of 1926.502(d), personal fall arrest systems used on scaffolds shall be attached by lanyard to a vertical lifeline, horizontal lifeline, or scaffold structural member. Vertical lifelines shall not be used when overhead components, such as overhead protection or additional platform levels, are part of a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold. On or about October 21, 2015, during the construction of a senior living complex, employer did not ensure an employee's fall arrest system was attached to a scaffold structural member.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee: On or about October 21, 2015, during the construction of a senior living complex the employer did not ensure an employees anchorage point for attachment of his personal fall arrest system was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about October 21, 2015, during the construction of a senior living complex the employer did not ensure an employees personal fall arrest system was rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Castle Construction, Company
View Castle Construction, Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341002863.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.