SALINA, KS —
OSHA Inspection: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES in 413 E. BERG RD., SALINA, KS 67401 (NAICS 335911). OSHA activity number 341016426.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
- Site address
- 413 E. BERG RD.
- City
- SALINA
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 67401
- Mailing
- 413 E. BERG RD., SALINA, KS 67401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335911
- Employees
- 623
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including, but not limited to items (d)(3)(i) through (d)(3)(vi) of this paragraph. The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment and atmospheric hazards when entering permit required spaces. This was most recently documented where employees entered #6 formation pump sump to perform job duties such as calibrating the pH probe, repairs and cleaning. Specific procedures had not been developed and implemented for entry.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5600
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.146 D06
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(6): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit space into which entry was authorized for the duration of entry operations: The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment and atmospheric hazards when entering permit required confined spaces. This was most recently documented on and before 11/19/2015 where employees entered a permit required confined space in the # 6 Formation Pump Sump that contained engulfment and atmospheric hazards to calibrate the pH probe. The employer did not ensure that entry was conducted with an attendant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 E01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): Before entry into a permit space was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit. The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment hazards when entering permit required confined spaces. This was most recently documented on and before 11/19/2015 where an employee entered a permit required confined space in the #6 Formation Pump Sump that contained engulfment and atmospheric hazards to calibrate the pH probe. The employer did not ensure that an entry permit was completed prior to entry into the space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment and atmospheric hazards This was most recently documented where affected employees entering permit required confined spaces were not properly trained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 H01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(h)(1): The employer did not ensure that all authorized entrants knew the hazards that could be faced during entry, including information on the mode, sign or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure: The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment and atmospheric hazards while entering permit required confined spaces. This was most recently documented on and before 11/19/2015 where an employee entered a permit required confined space in the #6 Formation Pump Sump that contained engulfment and atmospheric hazards to calibrate the pH probe. The employer did not ensure that each authorized entrant was aware of the hazards, to include, but not limited to symptoms associated with exposure to sulfuric acid, during entry into the space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 K01 II
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(k)(1)(ii): When designating rescue and emergency services pursuant to paragraph (d)(9), the employer did not evaluate the prospective rescuer's ability, in terms of proficiency with rescue-related tasks and equipment, to function appropriately while rescuing entrants from the particular space or types of spaces identified: The employer is failing to protect employees from engulfment and atmospheric hazards when entering permit required confined spaces. This was most recently documented where the designated rescue and emergency service was to call 911 and the emergency responders had not been evaluated as to their ability and equipment to provide rescue services for the facility's Permit Required Confined Spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $4,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section: The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical hazards when working in the formation area. This was most recently documented where employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as sulfuric acid in that the battery filling tank was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4400
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $5,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide information to the employees on operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present: The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical hazards while working in the formation area, metals area, and maintenance. This was most recently documented where employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including sulfuric acid, caustic soda, and lead in that employees were not provided adequate training on the chemicals they worked with in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5500
- — Z (S) $5500
More inspections at Exide Technologies
View Exide Technologies's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335911)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341016426.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.