Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO MARTINEZ in 6944 KING RANCH RD, ODESSA, TX 79766 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341021467.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eduardo Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO MARTINEZ
Site address
6944 KING RANCH RD
City
ODESSA
State
TX
ZIP
79766
Mailing
702 E 21 ST, CRANE, TX 79731
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Dec 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures.  Employees engaged in construction work were exposed  to trip and impalement hazards while walking around the construction site containing construction debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Dec 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   Employees engaged in framing operations working below the framed structure were exposed to struck by hazards from debris from employees working above.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Dec 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.  Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to struck by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.152 I06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.152(i)(6): In locations where flammable vapors could have been present, precautions were not taken to prevent ignition by eliminating or controlling sources of ignition:   Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to explosion hazards in that the employer placed a container of gasoline close to a combustible engine.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Dec 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step.  Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to fall hazards from using the cap step on the portable "A" ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

View Eduardo Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341021467.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.