Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO MARTINEZ in 1231 CLIPSTON, PROSPER, TX 75078 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347554503.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eduardo Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO MARTINEZ
Site address
1231 CLIPSTON
City
PROSPER
State
TX
ZIP
75078
Mailing
1721 NORTH BRENTS AVE, SHERMAN, TX 75090
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 22, 2024
Abate by
Aug 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $2,074 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about June 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, employees engaged in applying roofing materials were not provided fall protection exposing employees to an unprotected fall hazard of approximately 11 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2074.2
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 22, 2024
Abate by
Aug 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:   Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  Note:  The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.  On or about June 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employee(s) performed roofing work without wearing personal fall arrest systems.  Positioning device body belts were used for fall protection which are not allowed as personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 22, 2024
Abate by
Aug 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On or about June 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employee(s) performed roofing work without being provided hazard recognition and avoidance formal training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Eduardo Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347554503.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.