Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNION TANK CAR COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UNION TANK CAR COMPANY in 400 SOUTH BLANCHARD ST, VALDOSTA, GA 31601 (NAICS 336510). OSHA activity number 341025021.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Union Tank CAR Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Union Tank CAR Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 SOUTH BLANCHARD ST
City
VALDOSTA
State
GA
ZIP
31601
Mailing
400 SOUTH BLANCHARD ST, VALDOSTA, GA 31601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336510
Employees
129
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(2): Ladderway floor opening(s) or platform(s) were not guarded by a standard railing with standard toeboard(s) on all exposed sides (except at the entrance to opening) with passage through the railing either provided with a swinging gate or so offset that a person could walk directly into the opening:    a) East side/Exterior Blasting Booth- On or about, and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the entry access for the ladders leading to the work platform for the exterior blasting booth was unguarded, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11.1 feet onto metal grating.    b) West side/Exterior Blasting Booth- On or about, and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the entry access for the ladders leading to the work platforms for the exterior blasting hood was unguarded, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11.1 feet onto metal grating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5600
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.37 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): The exit route was not adequately lit so that an employee with normal vision could see along the exit route.     a) At the exterior blasting booth, on or about October 27, 2015 and at times prior to, emergency lighting was not provided for employees who worked in the area, resulting in a life safety hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":     a) At the Interior Blasting Area, on or about October 27, 2015 and at times prior to, one exit door that provided for emergency exit discharge from the area was not identified with an EXIT sign, resulting in a life safety hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color:     a) At the exterior blasting booth- On or about and at times prior to October 27, 2015, one exit door that provided for emergency exit discharge from the area was identified with an EXIT sign that was not appropriately illuminated, resulting in a life safety hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 15209135

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:   a) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015, the employer did not ensure that the respirator that was required to be worn by an employee while abrasive blasting railcars was clean, disinfected and in sanitary conditions, exposing the employee to respiratory and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.134 K01 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 15209135

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(iv): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of how to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator:  a) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015, the employee who was required to wear a supplied air blasting helmet while abrasive blasting rail cars was not effectively trained on how to maintain the respirator clean, disinfected and in sanitary conditions, exposing the employee to respiratory and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2):   Other substances -- 8-hour Time Weighted Averages. An employee's exposure to any substance in Table Z-1, the exposure limit of which is not preceded by a "C", shall not exceed the 8-hour Time Weighted Average given for that substance any 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour work week.    a) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015 an employee who performed abrasive blasting on railcars was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust) at an 8 hour Time-Weighted Average level of 273.33764 mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) which is approximately 18.2 times the Permissible Exposure Limit for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level is derived from a sample collected over a 329 minute sampling period.     b) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015 an employee who performed abrasive blasting on railcars was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust) at an 8 hour Time-Weighted Average level of 196.91201 mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) which is approximately 13.1 times the Permissible Exposure Limit for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level is derived from a sample collected over a 321 minute sampling period.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5000
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):     a) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015 adequate engineering and administrative controls were not provided for an employee who performed abrasive blasting on railcars was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust) at an 8 hour Time-Weighted Average level of 273.33764 mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) which is approximately 18.2 times the Permissible Exposure Limit for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level is derived from a sample collected over a 329 minute sampling period.     b) Exterior Blasting Booth  On or about November 18, 2015 adequate engineering and administrative controls were not provided for an employee who performed abrasive blasting on railcars was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust) at an 8 hour Time-Weighted Average level of 196.91201 mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) which is approximately 13.1 times the Permissible Exposure Limit for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level is derived from a sample collected over a 321 minute sampling period.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the employer did not obtain written manufacturer's approval when an attachment was used with a Hyster forklift truck (no nameplate) to move railcars throughout the facility, thus exposing employees to a struck-by and crush-by hazards.  b) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the employer did not obtain written manufacturer's approval when an attachment was used with a Hyster forklift truck (Model: H100XL) to move railcars throughout the facility, thus exposing employees to a struck-by and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:   a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place for a Hyster forklift truck that was used to move railcars throughout the facility,  exposing employees to a struck-by and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L03 I G

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
May 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(G): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training on fork and attachment adaptation, operation, and use limitations;    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 27, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that forklift operators were trained in safe operations including but not limited to not operating forklifts with attachments that did not receive the manufacturer's written approval, exposing employees to struck-by and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Union Tank CAR Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341025021.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.