Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. FORMLINER, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of U.S. FORMLINER, INC. in 370 COMMERCE BLVD., ATHENS, GA 30606 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 341027985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Formliner, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Formliner, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
370 COMMERCE BLVD.
City
ATHENS
State
GA
ZIP
30606
Mailing
370 COMMERCE BLVD., ATHENS, GA 30606
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326299
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes must be free and unobstructed. No materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route. The exit access must not go through a room that can be locked, such as a bathroom, to reach an exit or exit discharge, nor may it lead into a dead-end corridor. Stairs or a ramp must be provided where the exit route is not substantially level.  On 10/20/15, in the warehouse facility, designated emergency exit doors were equipped with dead bolt locks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, four propane tanks were stored unsecured and in the egress path at the back emergency exit door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $1760

1910.106 D07 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(7)(i)(a): A fire extinguisher having a rating of not less than 12-B units was not located outside of, but not more than 10 feet from, the door opening into any room used for storage as required.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, at the flammables storage container, the employer did not ensure a fire extinguisher was made available within 10 feet of the unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not implement a Respiratory Protection Program when employees were required to use both tight fitting and dust mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not require employees to use NIOSH certified dust mask respirators and instead permitted single strap non-NIOSH certified dust mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not implement a Respiratory Protection Program that included medical evaluations for employees required to use a tight fitting respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not implement a Respiratory Protection Program and provide fit tests to employees required to use tight fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii).  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not implement a Respiratory Protection Program that included training when employees were required to use both tight fitting and dust mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer has not provided a fire extinguisher training program to employees working at the facility on an at least annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer has not provided training to new employees that were hired after May 2015 when the last training for Hazard Communication was provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, including the manufactured rubber molds and wood dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 D01

Deleted Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut.  On or about 10/30/2015, in the production area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards as the Grizzly handfed circular crosscut table saw was not equipped with guarding.   U.S. Formliner Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.213(d)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1046520, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 4/30/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 370 Commerce Blvd, Athens, Georgia.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $6160

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $440 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA From 300 or equivalent), was not completed in detail as required by the regulation.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens facility, on the OSHA 300 log, under Column F, the log was not filled out in the detail as required and instead listed descriptions such as "cut finger", "shoulder hurt by lifting", "allergic reaction in eye".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $250
  • — Z (O) $440

1904.29 B02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $440 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness.  On 10/20/15, at the Athens location, the employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or its equivalent for each recordable injury or illness. Injuries include those that occurred on 6/14/15, 7/7/15, and 8/1/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $250
  • — Z (O) $440

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2015
Abate by
Dec 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.  On 10/20/15, in the warehouse area, the employer did not post a floor loading capacity rating above the offices and break room area when it was used as storage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View U.S. Formliner, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341027985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.