CAMDEN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: F & R PALLETS, INC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of F & R PALLETS, INC in 201 ERIE STREET, CAMDEN, NJ 08102 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 341037885.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- F & R PALLETS, INC
- Site address
- 201 ERIE STREET
- City
- CAMDEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08102
- Mailing
- 201 ERIE STREET, CAMDEN, NJ 08102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321920
- Employees
- 49
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program for employees with the following overexposures: a) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 159% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 272 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 278% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 97.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 471 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) Saw room: A trim saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 161% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 347 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 398% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 100 dBA. The sampling was performed for 463 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. e) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 272.4% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 97.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 350 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. f) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 253% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 9 6.7dBA. The sampling was performed for 253 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. g) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 67.3% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 87.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 445 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. h) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 78.4% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 88.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. i) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 89.7% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 269 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.95 I02 I
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors were worn by employees who were required by 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) to wear personal protective equipment: The employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by an employee with the following overexposure: a) Saw room: A trim saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 161% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 347 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.95 I02 II A
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors were worn by any employee who was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels or greater and had not yet had a baseline audiogram established pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by employees who had not yet had a baseline exam and had the following overexposures: a) Saw room: A trim saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 161% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 347 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 67.3% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 87.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 445 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 78.4% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 88.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 89.7% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 269 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who was exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: The employer did not institute a training program for employees with the following overexposures: a) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 159% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 272 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 278% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 97.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 471 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) Saw room: A trim saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 161% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 93.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 347 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) Saw room: A band saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 398% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 100 dBA. The sampling was performed for 463 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. e) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 272.4% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 97.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 350 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. f) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 253% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 96.7dBA. The sampling was performed for 253 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. g) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 67.3% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 87.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 445 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. h) Throughout facility: A forklift operator was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 78.4% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 88.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. i) Pallet repair: A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 89.7% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 269 minutes during one shift on 11/23/15. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: a) Throughout facility: The employer did not provide the information in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134 to employees who were provided N95 filtering face piece dust masks for voluntary use, on or about 11/5/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at F & R Pallets, INC
View F & R Pallets, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321920)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341037885.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.