Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MW INDUSTRIES INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MW INDUSTRIES INC in 260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, PONTOTOC, MS 38863 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 341086403.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MW Industries INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MW Industries INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MW INDUSTRIES INC
Site address
260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
PONTOTOC
State
MS
ZIP
38863
Mailing
260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, PONTOTOC, MS 38863
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336390
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that caused or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees were exposed to combustible dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards;     (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, the employer had not performed applicable evaluations such as but not limited to a process hazard analysis on the powder coating room and powder coating system and ducts to determine what deflagration/explosion controls were required as found in NFPA 654 and other applicable industry standards. The dust sample sent to the Salt Lake Testing Center was found to be positive for explosibiltiy and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3825

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,660 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards due to the absence of the lifter weight, rated load and other required markings on Below-the Hook lifting devices.    (a) Receiving steel room - On or about November 23, 2015, the West below-the-hook lifting device used to lift bundles of steel rods was not marked or had an inspection plate which listed the information below.    (b) Receiving steel room - On or about November 23, 2015, the East below-the-hook lifting device used to lift coils of steel rods or flat stock was not marked or had an inspection plate which listed the information below.      ASME B30.20 requires mechanical lifting devices shall be marked with, but not limited to, the following information:        - Manufacturers name and address        - Serial number        - Lifter weight, if over 100 lb. (45) kg        - Cold current (amps) (when applicable)        - Rated voltage (if applicable)        - Rated load (as described in para. 20-1.2.1(a)        - ASMS BTH-1 Design Category        - ASME BTH Service Class
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1660
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, combustible dust had accumulated on electrical boxes, control panels, receptacle, overhead conduit and pipes, top of powder coating sprayer, top half of fluorescent bulbs. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floors of every workroom were not maintained in a clean condition:  (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, on the floor areas not commonly used for walking, the combustible dust had accumulated from 4 to over 12 inches thick. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.    (a) Throughout the facility - On or about November 23, 2015, specific procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of hazardous energy for equipment such as but not limited to; overhead cranes, straighteners, coilers, heat treat, powder coating, air compressors, and etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1640
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, employees operating the Wirematic straighteners were exposed to ingoing nip points and rotating parts at the point of operations where the steel wire was straightened.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.307 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2): 29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not safe for the hazardous (classified location), nor approved for the hazardous (classified) location or the ignitable or combustible properties of the specific gas, vapor, dust or fiber that was present:    (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, electrical equipment such as the electrical cabinets, receptacles, conduit, and ceiling light fixtures were not rated for Class II combustible dust. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.179 G01 V

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not clearly marked for identification of functions:  (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the seven (7) button pendent control for the West overhead crane was not readable and three (3) of buttons had damaged protective covers.  (b) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the seven (7) button pendent control for the East overhead crane was not readable.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.184 C06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads:  (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the two metal mesh slings were not securely attached. Each of the six (6) hooks on the below-the-hook lifting device was missing the safety latch or other means of securing the load. Safety latches were considered feasible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.184 G01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(g)(1): Metal mesh sling(s) were not marked with permanently affixed durable marking(s) that stated the rated capacity for vertical basket hitch and choker hitch loadings:  (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the two metal mesh slings that were being used as a basket hitch were not marked with the rated capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2015
Abate by
Jan 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the main disconnect for the incoming power to the steel receiving room was not marked. The power was for the presses and straighteners.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View MW Industries INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341086403.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.