PONTOTOC, MS —
OSHA Inspection: MW INDUSTRIES INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MW INDUSTRIES INC in 260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, PONTOTOC, MS 38863 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 341086403.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MW INDUSTRIES INC
- Site address
- 260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- PONTOTOC
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 38863
- Mailing
- 260 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, PONTOTOC, MS 38863
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336390
- Employees
- 130
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that caused or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees were exposed to combustible dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards; (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, the employer had not performed applicable evaluations such as but not limited to a process hazard analysis on the powder coating room and powder coating system and ducts to determine what deflagration/explosion controls were required as found in NFPA 654 and other applicable industry standards. The dust sample sent to the Salt Lake Testing Center was found to be positive for explosibiltiy and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3825
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $1,660 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards due to the absence of the lifter weight, rated load and other required markings on Below-the Hook lifting devices. (a) Receiving steel room - On or about November 23, 2015, the West below-the-hook lifting device used to lift bundles of steel rods was not marked or had an inspection plate which listed the information below. (b) Receiving steel room - On or about November 23, 2015, the East below-the-hook lifting device used to lift coils of steel rods or flat stock was not marked or had an inspection plate which listed the information below. ASME B30.20 requires mechanical lifting devices shall be marked with, but not limited to, the following information: - Manufacturers name and address - Serial number - Lifter weight, if over 100 lb. (45) kg - Cold current (amps) (when applicable) - Rated voltage (if applicable) - Rated load (as described in para. 20-1.2.1(a) - ASMS BTH-1 Design Category - ASME BTH Service Class
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1660
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, combustible dust had accumulated on electrical boxes, control panels, receptacle, overhead conduit and pipes, top of powder coating sprayer, top half of fluorescent bulbs. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floors of every workroom were not maintained in a clean condition: (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, on the floor areas not commonly used for walking, the combustible dust had accumulated from 4 to over 12 inches thick. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $1,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section. (a) Throughout the facility - On or about November 23, 2015, specific procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of hazardous energy for equipment such as but not limited to; overhead cranes, straighteners, coilers, heat treat, powder coating, air compressors, and etc.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1640
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, employees operating the Wirematic straighteners were exposed to ingoing nip points and rotating parts at the point of operations where the steel wire was straightened.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.307 C02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2): 29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not safe for the hazardous (classified location), nor approved for the hazardous (classified) location or the ignitable or combustible properties of the specific gas, vapor, dust or fiber that was present: (a) Powder coating room for line A - On or about November 23, 2015, electrical equipment such as the electrical cabinets, receptacles, conduit, and ceiling light fixtures were not rated for Class II combustible dust. The powder coating material dust tested positive of explosion hazards and Class II dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.179 G01 V
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not clearly marked for identification of functions: (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the seven (7) button pendent control for the West overhead crane was not readable and three (3) of buttons had damaged protective covers. (b) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the seven (7) button pendent control for the East overhead crane was not readable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.184 C06
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads: (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the two metal mesh slings were not securely attached. Each of the six (6) hooks on the below-the-hook lifting device was missing the safety latch or other means of securing the load. Safety latches were considered feasible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.184 G01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(g)(1): Metal mesh sling(s) were not marked with permanently affixed durable marking(s) that stated the rated capacity for vertical basket hitch and choker hitch loadings: (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the two metal mesh slings that were being used as a basket hitch were not marked with the rated capacity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: (a) Receiving room for steel - On or about November 23, 2015, the main disconnect for the incoming power to the steel receiving room was not marked. The power was for the presses and straighteners.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at MW Industries INC
View MW Industries INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336390)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341086403.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.