Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE MARTINEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOSE MARTINEZ in 204 E. BIRCH, CANTON, IL 61520 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341105401.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE MARTINEZ
Site address
204 E. BIRCH
City
CANTON
State
IL
ZIP
61520
Mailing
2305 W. PROCTOR ST., PEORIA, IL 61605
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2016
Abate by
Mar 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On December 23, 2015, Jose Martinez was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:      a.    Citation 1 Item 1a & b and, b.    Citation 1 Item 2a and, c.    Citation 1 Item 4a.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2016
Abate by
Mar 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On December 3, 2015, Johnson's Roofing, LLC. was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:          Citation 1 Item 3b &
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:      Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL and   the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:       An employee engaged in roofing activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    An employee engaged in roofing activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.       Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15ft. 7in., on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer did not ensure employees were using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $300
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:     The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:       The employer had an employees exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:     Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards while accessing the work area via a ladder.  The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Jose Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341105401.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.