CANTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE MARTINEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOSE MARTINEZ in 204 E. BIRCH, CANTON, IL 61520 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341105401.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 204 E. BIRCH
- City
- CANTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61520
- Mailing
- 2305 W. PROCTOR ST., PEORIA, IL 61605
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On December 23, 2015, Jose Martinez was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 1a & b and, b. Citation 1 Item 2a and, c. Citation 1 Item 4a.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: On December 3, 2015, Johnson's Roofing, LLC. was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated. Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations: Citation 1 Item 3b &
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL and the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: An employee engaged in roofing activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. An employee engaged in roofing activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15ft. 7in., on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer did not ensure employees were using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards on a construction site in Canton, IL, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee: The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: The employer had an employees exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Dec 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards while accessing the work area via a ladder. The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Jose Martinez
View Jose Martinez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341105401.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.