Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AGRIDRY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AGRIDRY, LLC in 3460 US HWY 20, EDON, OH 43518 (NAICS 333922). OSHA activity number 341114197.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Agridry, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Agridry, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AGRIDRY, LLC
Site address
3460 US HWY 20
City
EDON
State
OH
ZIP
43518
Mailing
P.O. BOX 336, EDON, OH 43518
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333922
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2016
Abate by
Mar 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:      1.) On or about November 17, 2015,  the employer did not ensure that the workplaces were evaluated to determine if any structures or equipment that employees enter while performing their job were confined spaces and if any of the structures or equipment were permit-entry confined spaces.  An example of this violation is for a confined space entry at a client site located in Congerville, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2016
Abate by
Mar 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:       1.)  On or about November 17, 2015, the employer did not develop and implement a confined space entry program.  Employees regularly enter customers grain storage bins to install or repair equipment.  The program should include, but not be limited to, evaluation of the hazards associated with the permit space, provide the necessary equipment to safely enter the space, provide training, develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, and annually review the program and implement any improvements.  An example of this violation is for a confined space entry at a client site located in Congerville, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2016
Abate by
Feb 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:      1.)  On or about December 8, 2015, the employer did not ensure employees working near the weld department were protected from stray ultraviolet radiation from the arc rays by not providing welding curtains.  Employees assembling parts near the welding area were not protected from arc rays during the welding process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced

Hazardous substances 02400560

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:        1.) On or about December 7, 2015,  the employer failed to implement the elements of a written hazard communication program.  Employees were exposed to hazards including but not limited to carbon monoxide gas from the exhaust of a propane powered forklift and argon gas used in welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 02400560

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      1.) On or about December 7, 2015, the employer did not train employees on the hazards of the chemicals they were working with.  Employees were exposed to hazards including but not limited to carbon monoxide gas from the exhaust of a propane powered forklift and argon gas used in welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Agridry, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341114197.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.