Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TAYLOR PACKAGING CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TAYLOR PACKAGING CORPORATION in 925 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DRIVE, IMPERIAL, MO 63052 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 341191781.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Taylor Packaging Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Taylor Packaging Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
925 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DRIVE
City
IMPERIAL
State
MO
ZIP
63052
Mailing
925 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DRIVE, IMPERIAL, MO 63052
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
Employees
39
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:     Plant: Machine specific procedures were not developed and instituted for employees who conducted lockout and tag out activities on equipment such as, but not limited to, Hurco CNC to prevent caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted, at least, once every three years:    Plant:  Performance of each operator of powered industrial trucks such as, but not necessarily limited to, Toyota forklift (Model # 5FBC15, Serial # 50050), and a motorized hand truck, Multiton (Model # SW20-130, Serial # 0111386S100) was not conducted in, at least, 15 years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips and sparks:      Machine Shop: A DoAll vertical band saw with 3 inch exposed unused portion of the blade was not guarded to prevent operator injuries.  The guard in place did not cover the rotating edges of the blade where it stuck out on the guide rolls and above the guide rolls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.132 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not communicate personal protection equipment selection decision(s) to each affected employee:   Plant: Employees were provided safety glasses, gloves, ear plugs, and masks for convenience use.  The employees were not informed of the selection criteria used in determining the personal protective equipment provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; and the date(s) of the hazard assessment:   Plant: A written certification of hazard assessment was not maintained where employees were provided some forms of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Taylor Packaging Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341191781.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.