POOLER, GA —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE BRICENO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE BRICENO in 9 BRIDINGTON WAY, POOLER, GA 31322 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341214336.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE BRICENO
- Site address
- 9 BRIDINGTON WAY
- City
- POOLER
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31322
- Mailing
- 128 VILLAGE DR, GARDEN CITY, GA 31408
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Exterior of building, on or about, and at times preceding to, January 29, 2016, for employees utilizing pneumatic nail guns, eye protection was not utilized which exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 2, 2016
- Abate by
- May 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Exterior of building, on or about, and times preceding to, January 29, 2016, employees were subjected to an 9-foot fall hazard while framing in that fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- May 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: (a) Exterior of building, on or about and at times preceding to January 29, 2016, employee framing in a door archway was standing on the top step of a 6-step stepladder which exposed employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Jose Briceno
View Jose Briceno's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341214336.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.