Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GATECO, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GATECO, INC. in 635 S. 10TH ST., ALLENTOWN, PA 18103 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 341221398.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gateco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gateco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GATECO, INC.
Site address
635 S. 10TH ST.
City
ALLENTOWN
State
PA
ZIP
18103
Mailing
805 HARRISON ST., ALLENTOWN, PA 18103
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The spraying operations was not designed, installed or maintained that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) shall be not less than 100 linear feet per minute:    a) Paint Booth #2 - On or about February 17, 2016, employees performed paint spraying operations in the small paint booth which was not maintained that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth was not less than 100 linear feet per minute.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1430
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:    a) Paint Booth #1, North area of Shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees performed spraying operations inside of the big paint booth, but the employer did not maintain a clear space of at least three feet on all sides of the booth free from storage or combustible materials.    b) Paint Booth #2, Center area of Shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees performed spraying operations inside of the small paint booth, but the employer did not maintain a clear space of at least three feet on all sides of the booth free from storage or combustible materials.    c) Paint Booth #3, East area of Shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees performed spraying operations inside of the huge paint booth, but the employer did not maintain a clear space of at least three feet on all sides of the booth free from storage or combustible materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 22 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by:  a) South east area of shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees operated a Hyd-Mech horizontal band saw with model number S-20, but approximately 12 inches of the unused portion of the blade was not guarded.  b) South area of shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees operated a Milwaukee vertical band saw with model number 6232-20, but the saw was not equipped with guarding for the unused portions of the blade.  c) South area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, employees operated a three roll-forming machine manufactured by BCR with model number RBM 2-30, but no guarding was provided to protect the operators from the in-feed sections of the machine.  d) South west area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, employees operated horizontal lathe manufactured by J.J. McCabe Machinery with model number 2306, without chuck guards to protect the operator from injury when operated with the metal arms extending past the periphery of the chuck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) South west area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, pulleys located less than seven (7) feet from the work platform below the motor on a Webb milling machine with model number 2S were not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:  a) South west area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, horizontal belts located less than seven (7) feet from the floor level located below the motor on a vertical milling machine manufactured by Webb with model number 2S, were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least 15 inches above the belt, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields.  a) South area of shop - on or about February 10, 2016, employees performed MIG welding in the welding department consisting of two work stations, but the workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a) South west area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, employees operated a vertical milling machine manufactured by Webb with model 2S, but the sheathing from the flexible cord had pulled from the junction box exposing insulated terminals.  b) South west area of shop - on or about February 17, 2016, an extension cord powering a 110 lamp was not provided strain relief with the outer sheathing pulled from the plug casing, exposing insulated terminals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes were not kept free and unobstructed.  Materials or equipment were placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route.  a) South end of shop - on or about February 10, 2016, an exit route was not kept free and unobstructed with the employer storing oxygen cylinders permanently within the exit route.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP)  a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator:      a) On or about February 10, 2016, the employer did not obtain a written recommendation regarding the employees ability to use the half-face air purifying respirators from the PLHCP with the recommendation supplying the following information:    (A) Any limitations on respirator use related to the medical condition of the employee, or relating to the workplace conditions in which the respirator will be used, including whether or not the employee is medically able to use the respirator;    (B) The need, if any, for follow-up medical evaluations; and    (C) A statement that the PLHCP has provided the employee with a copy of the PLHCP's written recommendation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Gateco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341221398.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.