Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: T.Y.G. PRODUCTS, L.P.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of T.Y.G. PRODUCTS, L.P. in 1800 NORTH MCDONALD STREET, MCKINNEY, TX 75071 (NAICS 332119). OSHA activity number 341231058.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T.Y.G. Products, L.P. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T.Y.G. Products, L.P. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1800 NORTH MCDONALD STREET
City
MCKINNEY
State
TX
ZIP
75071
Mailing
1800 NORTH MCDONALD STREET, MCKINNEY, TX 75071
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332119
Employees
125
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) Employer did not ensure employees performing unjamming operations utilize energy control procedures when conducting lockout tagout operations on equipment of Paint Line 1.  b) Employer did not ensure employees performing services and maintenance operations utilize energy control procedures when conducting lockout tagout operations on equipment of Paint Line 1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this sec:    a) The employer did not ensure the energy control procedures outline the scope and authorization of employees performing lockout tagout on Paint Line 1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.147:    a) The employer did not ensure a tagout device used on Paint Line 1 was attached in a manner to prevent inadvertent or accidental removal.     b) The employer did not ensure a tagout device used to lockout out equipment on Paint Line 1 identified the identity of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    a) Employer did not ensure affected employees were instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:  a) Employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure on Paint Line 1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

View T.Y.G. Products, L.P.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341231058.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.